ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2020
Do Natriuretic Peptide Measurements Provide Insights into Management of End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Undergoing Dialysis?
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Galectin-3 as a prognostic biomarker in haemodialysis patients with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Long-Term Evolution of Post-COVID-19 Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Comparative Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewImpaired renal function may affect natriuretic peptide levels through a variety of factors and mechanisms, such as high prevalence of concomitant vascular and myocardial diseases, reduced clearance, increased risk of volume overload, and different types and solute removal techniques in the setting of dialysis. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence suggests that natriuretic peptide testing may provide insights into management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) on dialysis, as they have been shown to be independently associated with morbidity and mortality. RECENT
findingsRising natriuretic peptide levels over time may identify CKD patients more likely to approach ESRD and requiring dialysis initiation. Moreover, serial natriuretic peptide measurements may also be helpful in guiding fluid management in ESRD patients on dialysis. However, since patients with CKD usually have significantly higher and more variable baseline levels of natriuretic peptides than those without CKD, traditional cut-off values may not be applicable, and individualized trajectories should be applied and interpreted in the clinical context. Routine clinical use natriuretic peptide testing in the CKD and ESRD settings still needs to be refined and individualized, yet their diagnostic and prognostic values can provide valuable insights into clinical trajectories and potential treatment responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.