Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32939662›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Navigating assisted reproduction treatment in the time of COVID-19: concerns and considerations.

Mara Simopoulou, Konstantinos Sfakianoudis, Polina Giannelou, Anna Rapani, Charalampos Siristatidis, Panagiotis Bakas, Nikolaos Vlahos, Konstantinos Pantos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of COVID-19 on fertility and assisted reproductive technology (ART): a systematic review.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Pooled it
  2. SARS-CoV-2 can infect human embryos.Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  3. Obstetric challenges during COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mara SimopoulouDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias, 11527, Athens, Greece. marasimopoulou@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-9100
Konstantinos SfakianoudisCentre for Human Reproduction, Genesis Athens Clinic, Papanikoli, 15232, Athens, Greece.
Polina GiannelouDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias, 11527, Athens, Greece.
Anna RapaniDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias, 11527, Athens, Greece.
Charalampos SiristatidisAssisted Conception Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias, 11528, Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis BakasAssisted Conception Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias, 11528, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos VlahosAssisted Conception Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias, 11528, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos PantosCentre for Human Reproduction, Genesis Athens Clinic, Papanikoli, 15232, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has fueled numerous debates in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART) as the effect of SARS-CoV-2 on pregnancy and infancy is still considered uncharted territory. Various theses and recommendations on what optimal practice is have emerged, as evidenced by surveys, webinars, and recent publications. ART specialists are faced with dilemmas in light of the lack of concrete scientific evidence required to pave the way towards future safe practice. Meanwhile, infertile couples were similarly left in limbo unable to exercise their reproductive autonomy unlike fertile couples-where achieving a pregnancy via natural conception is a matter of decision. ART treatment being classified as non-essential has only recently re-started, facing new challenges while enabling pregnancy at a time of uncertainty. This article highlights matters of bioethical nature to be considered in the ART world at the time of COVID-19 while presenting an all-inclusive critique of the current status. When pursuing pregnancy through IVF treatment during the pandemic, distancing and caution have the lead role in an effort to defend the health of the intended parents and future children. To promote patient autonomy along with our ethical, moral, and legal duty towards our patients, emphasis should be given on ascertaining shared decision-making, and ensuring that an appropriate all-inclusive informed consent is signed prior to initiating any IVF treatment.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityReproductive Techniques, AssistedCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMalePandemicsPneumonia, ViralProfessional ethicsPublic healthReproductive technologiesRight to health care

Identifiers

PMID32939662
PMCPMC7494248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.