ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2020
Energetic and thermodynamical aspects of the cyclodextrins-cannabidiol complex in aqueous solution: a molecular-dynamics study.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Cannabinoid Bioavailability in Pain Management: The Role of Cyclodextrins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- In Vitro and In Silico Study on the Molecular Encapsulation of α-Tocopherol in a Large-Ring Cyclodextrin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cannabinoid Formulations and Delivery Systems: Current and Future Options to Treat Pain.Drugs · 2021Review
- Application of Molecular Dynamics Simulations in the Analysis of Cyclodextrin Complexes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Perspectives on Challenges in Cannabis Drug Delivery Systems: Where Are We?Medical cannabis and cannabinoidsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclodextrins (CDs) are well-known carriers for encapsulating hydrophobic molecules, while among cannabinoids, cannabidiol (CBD) has attracted considerable attention due to its therapeutic capability. In this framework, we employed molecular dynamics and docking techniques for investigating the interaction energy and thermodynamical issues between different CDs (α, β, and γ type) and CBD immersed in water and a solution mimicking a physiological environment. We quantified the energetic aspects, for different thermal conditions, in which both aqueous solutions interact with CBDs and CDs and the CBD-CDs complex itself. In order to approximate the physiological conditions, our simulations also included the mammalian temperature. The calculations revealed significant interaction energy between lactate and the CD surface and a movement of lactate toward CD as well. We observed an almost constant number of lactate molecules forming clusters without exhibiting a temperature dependence. Next, the degree of CBD-CDs complexation at four different temperatures was analyzed. The results showed that the complexation depends on the medium, becoming weaker with the temperature increment. Our findings highlighted that the entropy contribution is relevant for CBD-α-CD and CBD-β-CD, while CBD-γ-CD is practically insensitive to temperature changes for both solutions. In both water and artificial physiological solutions, the γ-CD appears more stable than the other complexes. Overall, CBD achieved partial encapsulation considering α-CD and β-CD, showing a temperature dependence, while γ-CD remained fully immersed no matter the thermal level assumed. We also discuss the pharmacological relevance and physiological implications of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.