Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32939573›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2021

Patient-reported outcome and experience measures in geriatric emergency medicine.

James D van Oppen, Jose M Valderas, Nicola J Mackintosh, Simon P Conroy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James D van OppenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH, Leicester, UK. jvo3@leicester.ac.uk.
Jose M ValderasHealth Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, EX1 2LU, Exeter, UK.
Nicola J MackintoshDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH, Leicester, UK.
Simon P ConroyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of Health 17/05/96
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older people with frailty and health crises have complex physical and social needs. Modern emergency care systems are fast-flowing, using protocols optimised for single-problem presentations. Systems must incorporate individualised care to best serve people with multiple problems. Healthcare quality is typically appraised with service metrics, such as department length of stay and mortality. Worldwide, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM) are increasingly used in research, service development and performance evaluation, paving the ground for their use to support individual clinical decision-making. The PROMs and PREMs are person-centred metrics, which inform healthcare decisions at the individual level and which at the strategic level drive improvement through comparison of interprovider effectiveness. To date, there is no PROM or PREM specifically developed for older people with frailty and emergency care needs.

Indexed as

Emergency MedicinePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health CareEmergency Service, HospitalHumansQuality of Health CareComorbiditiesFrailtyLength of stayOutcomePatient preference

Identifiers

PMID32939573
OpenAlexW3086903515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.