Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32939569›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2020

Moving towards online rheumatology education in the era of COVID-19.

Sakir Ahmed, Olena Zimba, Armen Yuri Gasparyan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Diagnostic delays in systemic vasculitides.Rheumatology international · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sustainable Development Goals in the Time of Crisis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sakir AhmedDepartment of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-311X
Olena ZimbaDepartment of Internal Medicine No. 2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4188-8486
Armen Yuri GasparyanDepartments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Pensnett Road, Dudley, West Midlands, DY1 2HQ, UK. a.gasparyan@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-6018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has unsettled conventional medical education, hastening a switch to digital platforms and open-access publishing. Rheumatology is a fast evolving academic discipline that stands to gain by this switch. Most rheumatology textbooks are now available in digital formats, and these are complemented with live updating educational hubs such as UpToDate and ClinicalKey. Emerging topics of COVID-19 on these proprietary platforms are now freely available to all specialists. Social media channels, particularly Twitter, are becoming major players in the era of COVID-19 by offering online journal clubs, enabling fast dissemination of influential articles, and facilitating interactive education. Indexed rheumatology journals, in turn, aid online education by opening access to recommendations and other materials that are rapidly changing research and practice worldwide. Research peer review additionally offers learning experience to novice and seasoned researchers and authors. Global rheumatology societies have online learning resources, which are changing their format and geographic reach to meet the changing needs in the times of pandemic. While online teaching lacks emotional connections between mentors and mentees, switch to a more interactive format of education and regular contacts may partly solve the issue. Rheumatologists can take the lead in these challenging times and contribute more to online scholarly activities which are aimed to maintain and enrich education. Key Points • Disparities in rheumatology education are likely to be widened during the COVID-19 pandemic. • Barriers to rheumatology education include limited number of instructors and their limited experience in online teaching. • Online textbooks, didactic materials of indexed rheumatology journals, and frequently updated online educational hubs such as UpToDate serve as a foundation of online rheumatology education. • Online rheumatology education is enriched by peer review and social media activities, which are becoming major players in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsEducation, DistancePandemicsPneumonia, ViralBetacoronavirusCOVID-19HumansInformation DisseminationPeer Review, ResearchRheumatologySARS-CoV-2Social MediaSocieties, MedicalCOVID-19E-learningMedical educationRheumatologySocial media

Identifiers

PMID32939569
PMCPMC7494363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.