ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2020
Fracture resistance, failure mode and stress concentration in a modified endocrown design.
Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of endocrown design modification on retention & microleakage: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Influence of endocrown-retained fixed dental prosthesis design on marginal integrity and fracture resistance.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
- Fracture Strength of CAD/CAM Endocrown and Post-Core Restorations with Fiber Strip Reinforcement in Mandibular Premolars.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Effect of Pulpal Base, Restorative Material, and Preparation Type on Marginal and Internal Fit and Fracture Strength of Endocrowns.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of one-piece endodontic crowns fabricated with CAD-CAM system to molars.The Japanese dental science review · 2024Review
- Knowledge and Practice of Endocrown Restorations Among Dental Students and Dentists in Sirte, Libya.Cureus · 2024Article
- Comparative Assessment of Post-Fatigue Resistance of Mandibular First Molars Restored With Polyether Ether Ketone and Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2024Article
- Endocrowns - a literature review.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Biomechanical Stability of Teeth Tissue According to Crown Materials: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Unlocking Endocrown Restoration Expertise Among Dentists: Insights from a Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Finite element and in vitro study on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct or indirect composite restorations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comparison of retention and fracture load of endocrowns made from zirconia and zirconium lithium silicate after aging: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Effect of Preparation Design on Marginal Integrity and Fracture Resistance of Endocrowns: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in dentistry · 2022Article
- Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Endocrown Biomechanical Response According to Different Pulp Chamber Extension Angles and Filling Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effect of Restorative Material on Mechanical Response of Provisional Endocrowns: A 3D-FEA Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess fracture resistance, failure mode and stress concentration of a modified endocrown preparation design, under axial and lateral forces. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty lower molars were divided into two groups (
resultsFracture resistance showed a statistically significant difference between conventional and modified preparations (
conclusionModified endocrown design showed higher fracture resistance than conventional endocrown. Lateral loading displayed a high percentage of severe fracture but under higher load to failure than the values reported for normal masticatory forces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.