ArticleForensic sciences research2020
Improved resolution of mixed STR profiles using a fully automated differential cell lysis/DNA extraction method.
Article in Forensic sciences research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating novel and conventional cell-separation techniques for sexual assault investigations.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
- Advancements in differentiation between sperm cells and epithelial cells for efficient forensic DNA analysis in sexual assault cases.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Review
- Toward Analysis at the Point of Need: A Digital Microfluidic Approach to Processing Multi-Source Sexual Assault Samples.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Manual Silica-Based DNA Extractions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Clinical, cytogenomic, and molecular characterization of isodicentric Y-chromosome and prediction of testicular sperm retrieval outcomes in azoospermic and severe oligozoospermic infertile men.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.Journal of forensic sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual assault evidence often contains sperm cells, which are typically separated from nonsperm cells using manual differential lysis procedures. The goal of this study was to evaluate the automated QIAGEN QIAcube for this purpose and to compare it to manual QIAGEN and manual organic differential methods using DNA yields
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.