Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32939274›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2020

The susceptibility of disulfide bonds towards radiation damage may be explained by S⋯O interactions.

Rajasri Bhattacharyya, Jesmita Dhar, Shubhra Ghosh Dastidar, Pinak Chakrabarti, Manfred S Weiss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identifying and avoiding radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structure of Usutu virus SAAR-1776 displays fusion loop asymmetry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rajasri BhattacharyyaDepartment of Biochemistry, Bose Institute, P-1/12 CIT Scheme VIIM, Kolkata 700 054, India.
Jesmita DharDepartment of Biochemistry, Bose Institute, P-1/12 CIT Scheme VIIM, Kolkata 700 054, India.
Shubhra Ghosh DastidarDivision of Bioinformatics, Bose Institute, P-1/12 CIT Scheme VIIM, Kolkata 700 054, India.
Pinak ChakrabartiDepartment of Biochemistry, Bose Institute, P-1/12 CIT Scheme VIIM, Kolkata 700 054, India.
Manfred S WeissMacromolecular Crystallography (HZB-MX), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 15, D-12489 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2362-7047
Bose Institute · INHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation-induced damage to protein crystals during X-ray diffraction data collection is a major impediment to obtaining accurate structural information on macromolecules. Some of the specific impairments that are inflicted upon highly brilliant X-ray irradiation are metal-ion reduction, disulfide-bond cleavage and a loss of the integrity of the carboxyl groups of acidic residues. With respect to disulfide-bond reduction, previous results have indicated that not all disulfide bridges are equally susceptible to damage. A careful analysis of the chemical environment of disulfide bonds in the structures of elastase, lysozyme, acetylcholinesterase and other proteins suggests that S-S bonds which engage in a close contact with a carbonyl O atom along the extension of the S-S bond vector are more susceptible to reduction than the others. Such an arrangement predisposes electron transfer to occur from the O atom to the disulfide bond, leading to its reduction. The interaction between a nucleophile and an electrophile, akin to hydrogen bonding, stabilizes protein structures, but it also provides a pathway of electron transfer to the S-S bond, leading to its reduction during exposure of the protein crystal to an intense X-ray beam. An otherwise stabilizing interaction can thus be the cause of destabilization under the condition of radiation exposure.

Indexed as

disulfide bondselectron transferNBOquantum-chemical calculationsradiation damageS⋯O interactions

Identifiers

PMID32939274
PMCPMC7467163
OpenAlexW3046110940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.