Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32939031›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2021

Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease.

Kushani Jayasinghe, Zornitza Stark, Peter G Kerr, Clara Gaff, Melissa Martyn, John Whitlam, Belinda Creighton, Elizabeth Donaldson, Matthew Hunter, Anna Jarmolowicz and 20 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Testing in the Management of Adult CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Kushani JayasingheDepartment of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9268-8505
Zornitza StarkMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter G KerrDepartment of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Clara GaffMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.
Melissa MartynMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
John WhitlamDepartment of Nephrology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Belinda CreightonCancer Genetics and Genomics Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Elizabeth DonaldsonDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Matthew HunterMonash Genetics, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Anna JarmolowiczDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Lilian JohnstoneDepartment of Pediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Emma KrzesinskiMonash Genetics, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Sebastian LunkeVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Australia.
Elly LynchMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.
Kathleen NichollsDepartment of Nephrology, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Chirag PatelThe KidGen Collaborative, Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.
Yael PrawerMonash Genetics, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Jessica RyanDepartment of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Emily J SeeDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew TalbotDepartment of Nephrology, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Alison TrainerDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Rigan TytherleighMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Giulia ValenteClinical Genetics Service, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Mathew WallisClinical Genetics Service, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Louise WardropMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Kirsty H WestMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.
Susan M WhiteDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ella WilkinsMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew J Mallett *Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Catherine Quinlan *Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. Cathy.Quinlan@rch.org.au.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUMonash Health · AUMonash Medical Centre · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUAustin Health · AUMelbourne Health · AUVictorian Clinical Genetics Services · AUMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance · AUMonash Children’s Hospital · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of exome sequencing (ES) in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease.

methodsWe performed clinically accredited singleton ES in a prospectively ascertained cohort of 204 patients assessed in multidisciplinary renal genetics clinics at four tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia.

resultsES identified a molecular diagnosis in 80 (39%) patients, encompassing 35 distinct genetic disorders. Younger age at presentation was independently associated with an ES diagnosis (p < 0.001). Of those diagnosed, 31/80 (39%) had a change in their clinical diagnosis. ES diagnosis was considered to have contributed to management in 47/80 (59%), including negating the need for diagnostic renal biopsy in 10/80 (13%), changing surveillance in 35/80 (44%), and changing the treatment plan in 16/80 (20%). In cases with no change to management in the proband, the ES result had implications for the management of family members in 26/33 (79%). Cascade testing was subsequently offered to 40/80 families (50%).

conclusionIn this pragmatic pediatric and adult cohort with suspected monogenic kidney disease, ES had high diagnostic and clinical utility. Our findings, including predictors of positive diagnosis, can be used to guide clinical practice and health service design.

Indexed as

ExomeKidney DiseasesAdultAustraliaChildExome SequencingGenetic TestingHumanschronic kidney diseaseexome sequencinggenetic kidney disease

Identifiers

PMID32939031
PMCPMC7790755
OpenAlexW3087447407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.