Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32939019›Full record

Trial reportMolecular psychiatry2021

Network dynamics of depressive symptoms in antidepressant medication treatment: secondary analysis of eight clinical trials.

Kaisla Komulainen, Jaakko Airaksinen, Kateryna Savelieva, Kia Gluschkoff, Regina García Velázquez, Marko Elovainio, Markus Jokela

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Relations among symptoms of depression over time in at-risk youth.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaisla KomulainenDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. kaisla.komulainen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1576-7111
Jaakko AiraksinenDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7773-7615
Kateryna SavelievaDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4662-9707
Kia GluschkoffDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0340-4209
Regina García VelázquezDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-6557
Marko ElovainioFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Markus JokelaDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression can be viewed as a network of depressive symptoms that tend to reinforce each other via feedback loops. Specific symptoms of depression may be differently responsive to antidepressant treatment, and some symptoms may be more important than others in the overall improvement of depression associated with treatment. We pooled prospective data from eight industry-sponsored placebo-controlled trials for paroxetine, fluoxetine and imipramine (total n = 3559) to examine whether improvements in specific depressive symptoms were more strongly related to improvements in other depressive symptoms among patients on active antidepressant treatment as compared to placebo. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Data on treatment was dichotomized into active treatment (receiving any antidepressant agent) vs. placebo. Time-lagged longitudinal analyses suggested that improvement in three symptoms-depressed mood, insomnia, and suicidality-had a broader overall impact on subsequent improvement in other depressive symptoms in the antidepressant condition compared to placebo (i.e., greater out-strength). Moreover, improvements in depressed mood and insomnia were more likely to follow the improvements in other symptoms in the antidepressant condition compared to placebo (i.e., greater in-strength). These results from clinical trial data suggest that depressed mood, insomnia, and suicidality may be particularly important in accounting for the remission and recovery in response to antidepressant treatment.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressionFluoxetineHumansParoxetineProspective StudiesAntidepressive AgentsFluoxetineParoxetine

Identifiers

PMID32939019
OpenAlexW3087227930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.