Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32938680›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Ancient DNA shows domestic horses were introduced in the southern Caucasus and Anatolia during the Bronze Age.

Silvia Guimaraes, Benjamin S Arbuckle, Joris Peters, Sarah E Adcock, Hijlke Buitenhuis, Hannah Chazin, Ninna Manaseryan, Hans-Peter Uerpmann, Thierry Grange, Eva-Maria Geigl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Differential Expression and Analysis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic Insights into Post-Domestication Expansion and Selection of Body Size in Ponies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia GuimaraesInstitut Jacques Monod, CNRS, University of Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3778-3315
Benjamin S ArbuckleDepartment of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5445-5516
Joris PetersArchaeoBioCenter and Department of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Kaulbachstraße 37/111, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Sarah E AdcockDepartment of Anthropology, University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3685-5521
Hijlke BuitenhuisGroningen Institute of Archaeology, University of Groningen, 9712 ER Groningen, Netherlands.
Hannah ChazinDepartment of Anthropology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10031, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-2425
Ninna ManaseryanScientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology, Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, 7 Paruyr Sevak Str., Yerevan 0014, Armenia.
Hans-Peter UerpmannInstitut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelalters, Abteilung für Ältere Urgeschichte und Quartärökologie, Zentrum für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie, Universität Tübingen, Rümelinstraße 23, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Thierry GrangeInstitut Jacques Monod, CNRS, University of Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-3092
Eva-Maria GeiglInstitut Jacques Monod, CNRS, University of Paris, Paris, France. eva-maria.geigl@ijm.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-6376-2094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the important roles that horses have played in human history, particularly in the spread of languages and cultures, and correspondingly intensive research on this topic, the origin of domestic horses remains elusive. Several domestication centers have been hypothesized, but most of these have been invalidated through recent paleogenetic studies. Anatolia is a region with an extended history of horse exploitation that has been considered a candidate for the origins of domestic horses but has never been subject to detailed investigation. Our paleogenetic study of pre- and protohistoric horses in Anatolia and the Caucasus, based on a diachronic sample from the early Neolithic to the Iron Age (~8000 to ~1000 BCE) that encompasses the presumed transition from wild to domestic horses (4000 to 3000 BCE), shows the rapid and large-scale introduction of domestic horses at the end of the third millennium BCE. Thus, our results argue strongly against autochthonous independent domestication of horses in Anatolia.

Identifiers

PMID32938680
PMCPMC7494339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.