Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32938512›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2020

UK psychiatrists' experience of withdrawal of antipsychotics prescribed for challenging behaviours in adults with intellectual disabilities and/or autism.

Shoumitro Deb, Tom Nancarrow, Bharati Limbu, Rory Sheehan, Mike Wilcock, David Branford, Ken Courtenay, Bhathika Perera, Rohit Shankar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shoumitro DebFaculty of Medicine, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1300-8103
Tom NancarrowUniversity of Exeter Medical School, UK.
Bharati LimbuFaculty of Medicine, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Rory SheehanDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4164-9661
Mike WilcockRoyal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK.
David BranfordNHS England, Leicester, UK.
Ken CourtenayFaculty of Intellectual Disabilities, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
Bhathika PereraHaringey Learning Disability Partnership, Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Rohit ShankarUniversity of Exeter Medical School, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1183-6933
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust · GBRoyal College of Psychiatrists · GBRoyal Cornwall Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA high proportion of adults with intellectual disabilities are prescribed off-licence antipsychotics in the absence of a psychiatric illness. The National Health Service in England launched an initiative in 2016, 'Stopping over-medication of people with a learning disability [intellectual disability], autism or both' (STOMP), to address this major public health concern.

aimsTo gain understanding from UK psychiatrists working with adults with intellectual disabilities on the successes and challenges of withdrawing antipsychotics for challenging behaviours.

methodAn online questionnaire was sent to all UK psychiatrists working in the field of intellectual disability (estimated 225).

resultsHalf of the 88 respondents stated that they started withdrawing antipsychotics over 5 years ago and 52.3% stated that they are less likely to initiate an antipsychotic since the launch of STOMP. However, since then, 46.6% are prescribing other classes of psychotropic medication instead of antipsychotics for challenging behaviours, most frequently the antidepressants. Complete antipsychotic discontinuation in over 50% of patients treated with antipsychotics was achieved by only 4.5% of respondents (n = 4); 11.4% reported deterioration in challenging behaviours in over 50% of patients on withdrawal and the same proportion (11.4%) reported no deterioration. Only 32% of respondents made the diagnosis of psychiatric illness in all their patients themselves. Family and paid carers' concern, lack of multi-agency and multidisciplinary input and unavailability of non-medical psychosocial intervention are key reported factors hampering the withdrawal attempt.

conclusionsThere is an urgent need to develop national guidelines to provide a framework for systematic psychotropic drug reviews and withdrawal where possible.

Indexed as

adultsantipsychoticsIntellectual disabilitiesSTOMPwithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID32938512
PMCPMC7576649
OpenAlexW3087378040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.