Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32938464›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2020

Unpack the Salt: an evaluation of the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership's media advocacy activities to highlight the salt content of different foods.

Emalie Rosewarne, Kathy Trieu, Clare Farrand, Jenny Reimers, Jane Potter, Chelsea Davidson, Natasha Darrigan, Elizabeth Joldeski, Sian Armstrong, Jacqui Webster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterisation of At-Scale Community Health Interventions Aimed to Improve Healthy Eating Behaviour in Australia: A Rapid Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emalie RosewarneThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. erosewarne@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5748-3953
Kathy TrieuThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Clare FarrandThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Jenny ReimersVictorian Health Promotion Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Jane PotterVictorian Health Promotion Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Chelsea DavidsonNational Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC, 3008, Australia.
Natasha DarriganNational Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC, 3008, Australia.
Elizabeth JoldeskiNational Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC, 3008, Australia.
Sian ArmstrongNational Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC, 3008, Australia.
Jacqui WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAustralians are consuming almost double the recommended maximum salt intake. The Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership was established to coordinate efforts to reduce salt intake in the state of Victoria. As part of an intervention strategy, media advocacy strategies were used to raise public awareness and stimulate industry and government action on salt reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership's media advocacy activities by determining the extent to which activities contributed to the overall strategy aims and the effectiveness of the activities in gaining media and industry engagement.

methodsA framework for evaluating media advocacy strategies used in complex public health interventions was used to guide this evaluation. Media advocacy activities were monitored and documented throughout the intervention period. A content analysis of media release press statements was performed. Indicators of media coverage (media items, cumulative audience reach, advertising space rate) and food industry engagement (number of meetings, number and type of follow up actions) were tracked.

resultsSix media releases were issued between March 2017 and November 2018 on different processed food categories including breads, cooking sauces, ready meals, dips and crackers, processed meats and Asian-style sauces. Three main themes were identified in the qualitative analysis of the press statements: general information on salt and health, salt levels in foods, and calls to action for consumers, industry and/or government. These themes were aligned with the overall intervention strategy. Media items (print and online news, radio and TV) generated by each release ranged from 36 to 274, and cumulative audience reach (opportunities to see) ranged from 2.3 to 7.5 million Australians per release. One to three food manufacturers were met with per media release.

conclusionsDisseminating sodium-monitoring data through media releases can be used as a tool to gain access to the media and reach consumers with salt reduction messages, and to engage food manufacturers in discussions about salt reduction. Characteristics of media advocacy activities, including alignment with the overall strategy, and external factors outside the of control of the program implementers, can influence media and industry engagement. When planning future nutrition interventions that include media advocacy activities, internal and external factors impacting outcomes, should be considered, documented and evaluated.

Indexed as

Food IndustrySodium Chloride, DietaryAustraliaFast FoodsHumansSodium ChlorideSodium ChlorideSodium Chloride, DietaryAustraliaMedia advocacySalt reduction

Identifiers

PMID32938464
PMCPMC7495894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.