Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32938393›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

Detection of mutations in the rpoB gene of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains inhibiting wild type probe hybridization in the MTBDR plus assay by DNA sequencing directly from clinical specimens.

Pallavi Sinha, G N Srivastava, Rajneesh Tripathi, Mukti Nath Mishra, Shampa Anupurba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Epidemiological Profile andInternational journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Multi-drug resistant gene mutation analysis inIranian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Phenotypic and Genotypic Drug Resistance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pallavi SinhaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221 005, India.
G N SrivastavaDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India. gn_sri@yahoo.co.in.
Rajneesh TripathiDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221 005, India.
Mukti Nath MishraCSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow, 226015, India.
Shampa AnupurbaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221 005, India. shampa_anupurba@yahoo.co.in.
Institute of Medical Sciences · INBanaras Hindu University · INCentral Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants · IN

Funding

National Science and Technology Management Information System DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential of genetic testing for rapid and accurate diagnosis of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains is vital for efficient treatment and reduction in dissemination. MTBDR plus assays rapidly detect mutations related to drug resistance and wild type sequences allied with susceptibility. Although these methods are promising, the examination of molecular level performance is essential for improved assay result interpretation and continued diagnostic development. Therefore this study aimed to determine novel mutations that were inhibiting wild type probe hybridization in the Line probe assay by DNA sequencing. Using data collected from Line Probe assay (GenoType MTBDRplus assay) the contribution of absent wild type probe hybridization to the detection of rifampicin resistance was assessed via comparison to a reference standard method i.e. DNA sequencing.

resultsSequence analysis of the rpoB gene of 47 MTB resistant strains from clinical specimens showed that 37 had a single mutation, 9 had double mutations and one had triple mutations in the ropB gene.

conclusionsThe absence of wild type probe hybridization without mutation probe hybridization was mainly the result of the failure of mutation probe hybridization and the result of the novel or rare mutations. Additional probes are necessary to be included in the Line probe assay to improve the detection of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains.

Indexed as

Antibiotics, AntitubercularBacterial ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA ProbesDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansIn Situ HybridizationMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisRifampinSequence Analysis, DNASputumTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntibiotics, AntitubercularBacterial ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDNA ProbesRifampinrpoB protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisDNA sequencingGenotype MTBDRplusLine probe assaysMycobacterium tuberculosisReference standard

Identifiers

PMID32938393
PMCPMC7493411
OpenAlexW3084645690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.