ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Computationally identifying hot spots in protein-DNA binding interfaces using an ensemble approach.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An ensemble-based model comprising deep learning for predicting peptide-binding residues in proteins.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Prediction of Protein-DNA Interface Hot Spots Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and Machine Learning.Genes · 2024Article
- Functional characterization of HNF4A gene variants identify promoter and cell line specific transactivation effects.Human molecular genetics · 2024Article
- PepCNN deep learning tool for predicting peptide binding residues in proteins using sequence, structural, and language model features.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- HPC-Atlas: Computationally Constructing A Comprehensive Atlas of Human Protein Complexes.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Prediction of hot spots in protein-DNA binding interfaces based on discrete wavelet transform and wavelet packet transform.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction Sites by Multifeature Fusion and RF with mRMR and IFS.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Complementarity of the residue-level protein function and structure predictions in human proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Nabe: an energetic database of amino acid mutations in protein-nucleic acid binding interfaces.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Article
- DeepD2V: A Novel Deep Learning-Based Framework for Predicting Transcription Factor Binding Sites from Combined DNA Sequence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtein-DNA interaction governs a large number of cellular processes, and it can be altered by a small fraction of interface residues, i.e., the so-called hot spots, which account for most of the interface binding free energy. Accurate prediction of hot spots is critical to understand the principle of protein-DNA interactions. There are already some computational methods that can accurately and efficiently predict a large number of hot residues. However, the insufficiency of experimentally validated hot-spot residues in protein-DNA complexes and the low diversity of the employed features limit the performance of existing methods.
resultsHere, we report a new computational method for effectively predicting hot spots in protein-DNA binding interfaces. This method, called PreHots (the abbreviation of Predicting Hotspots), adopts an ensemble stacking classifier that integrates different machine learning classifiers to generate a robust model with 19 features selected by a sequential backward feature selection algorithm. To this end, we constructed two new and reliable datasets (one benchmark for model training and one independent dataset for validation), which totally consist of 123 hot spots and 137 non-hot spots from 89 protein-DNA complexes. The data were manually collected from the literature and existing databases with a strict process of redundancy removal. Our method achieves a sensitivity of 0.813 and an AUC score of 0.868 in 10-fold cross-validation on the benchmark dataset, and a sensitivity of 0.818 and an AUC score of 0.820 on the independent test dataset. The results show that our approach outperforms the existing ones.
conclusionsPreHots, which is based on stack ensemble of boosting algorithms, can reliably predict hot spots at the protein-DNA binding interface on a large scale. Compared with the existing methods, PreHots can achieve better prediction performance. Both the webserver of PreHots and the datasets are freely available at: http://dmb.tongji.edu.cn/tools/PreHots/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.