Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3293836›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews1988

Organ specificity of tumor metastasis: role of preferential adhesion, invasion and growth of malignant cells at specific secondary sites.

G L Nicolson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 505 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metastasis-associated protein 1 as a new prognostic marker for solid tumors: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The expressions of autotaxin-lysophosphatidate signaling-related proteins in metastatic breast cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A history of exploring cancer in context.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Versatile roles of extracellular vesicles in cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Cancer and the metastatic substrate.Ecancermedicalscience · 2016
    Review
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G L NicolsonDepartment of Tumor Biology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston 77030.
Anderson Hospital · US

Funding

TUMOR METASTASISR35CA044352 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI NICOLSON, GARTH L · 1987 to 1993
–
NCI NIH HHS R35-CA44352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The locations of distant secondary tumors in many clinical cancers and animal tumors are nonrandom, and their distributions cannot be explained by simple anatomical or mechanical hypotheses based on the simple lodgment or trapping of tumor cell emboli in the first capillary bed encountered. Evidence from certain experimental tumor systems supports Paget's 'seed and soil' hypothesis on the nonrandom distributions of metastases, in which the unique properties of particular tumor cells ('seeds') and the different characteristics of each organ microenvironment ('soil') collectively determine the organ preference of metastasis. Experimentally, differential tumor cell adhesion to organ-derived microvessel endothelial cells and organ parenchymal cells, differential invasion of basement membranes and organ tissues, and differential responses to organ-derived growth-stimulatory and -inhibitory factors all appear to be important determinants in explaining the organ preference of metastasis. Each tumor system may achieve organ specificity because of its own unique set of multiple metastasis-associated properties and responses to host microenvironments. As neoplasms progress to more highly malignant states multisite metastases are more likely and organ-specific metastases may be masked or circumvented owing to stochastic events, tumor cell diversification, host selection processes, and increased production of tumor autocrine molecules that may modulate adhesion, invasion, growth, and other properties important in metastasis. The importance of each of these properties, however, appears to vary considerably among different metastatic tumor systems. These and other tumor cell and host properties may eventually be used to predict and explain the unique metastatic distributions of certain human malignancies.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell DivisionNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisOrgan Specificity

Identifiers

PMID3293836
OpenAlexW2047846174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.