Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32938358›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Variable-order reference-free variant discovery with the Burrows-Wheeler Transform.

Nicola Prezza, Nadia Pisanti, Marinella Sciortino, Giovanna Rosone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. phyBWT2: phylogeny reconstruction via eBWT positional clustering.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Computing the original eBWT faster, simpler, and with less memory.International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval : SPIRE ... : proceedings. SPIRE (Symposium) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola PrezzaDipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo, 3, Pisa, Italy.
Nadia PisantiDipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo, 3, Pisa, Italy.
Marinella SciortinoDipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università di Palermo, Via Archirafi, 34, Palermo, Italy.
Giovanna RosoneDipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo, 3, Pisa, Italy. giovanna.rosone@unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-1214
University of Pisa · ITUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn [Prezza et al., AMB 2019], a new reference-free and alignment-free framework for the detection of SNPs was suggested and tested. The framework, based on the Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT), significantly improves sensitivity and precision of previous de Bruijn graphs based tools by overcoming several of their limitations, namely: (i) the need to establish a fixed value, usually small, for the order k, (ii) the loss of important information such as k-mer coverage and adjacency of k-mers within the same read, and (iii) bad performance in repeated regions longer than k bases. The preliminary tool, however, was able to identify only SNPs and it was too slow and memory consuming due to the use of additional heavy data structures (namely, the Suffix and LCP arrays), besides the BWT.

resultsIn this paper, we introduce a new algorithm and the corresponding tool ebwt2InDel that (i) extend the framework of [Prezza et al., AMB 2019] to detect also INDELs, and (ii) implements recent algorithmic findings that allow to perform the whole analysis using just the BWT, thus reducing the working space by one order of magnitude and allowing the analysis of full genomes. Finally, we describe a simple strategy for effectively parallelizing our tool for SNP detection only. On a 24-cores machine, the parallel version of our tool is one order of magnitude faster than the sequential one. The tool ebwt2InDel is available at github.com/nicolaprezza/ebwt2InDel .

conclusionsResults on a synthetic dataset covered at 30x (Human chromosome 1) show that our tool is indeed able to find up to 83% of the SNPs and 72% of the existing INDELs. These percentages considerably improve the 71% of SNPs and 51% of INDELs found by the state-of-the art tool based on de Bruijn graphs. We furthermore report results on larger (real) Human whole-genome sequencing experiments. Also in these cases, our tool exhibits a much higher sensitivity than the state-of-the art tool.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomicsHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAAlignment-freeAssembly-freeBWTINDELSNP

Identifiers

PMID32938358
PMCPMC7493873
OpenAlexW3087625265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.