ArticlePrion2020
A patient with spastic paralysis finally diagnosed as V180I genetic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease 9 years after onset.
Article in Prion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Clinical and Pathophysiological Features of Genetic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Caused by a Val-to-Ile Mutation at Codon 180 in the Prion Protein Gene.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Case Report: Genetic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease With a G114V Mutation and One Octapeptide Repeat Deletion as a Mimic of Frontotemporal Dementia.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (gCJD) with a mutation in codon 180 of the prion protein gene (V180I gCJD) is the most common form of gCJD in Japan, but only a few cases have been reported in Europe and the United States. It is clinically characterized by occurring in the elderly and presenting as slowly progressive dementia, although it generally shows less cerebellar and pyramidal symptoms than sporadic CJD. Here, we report a patient with V180I gCJD who initially presented with slowly progressive spastic paralysis with neither cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) nor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities. His symptoms progressed gradually, and after 9 years, he displayed features more typical of CJD. Diffusion-weighted MRI revealed high-intensity signals in the cortical gyrus, and there was a marked increase of 14-3-3 protein and total tau protein in the CSF, but he was negative for the real-time quaking-induced conversion assay. Although the time course was more consistent with Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease than CJD, genetic testing revealed V180I gCJD. This is the first report of a patient with V180I gCJD who initially presented with spastic paralysis, and also the first to reveal that it took 9 years from disease onset for cortical dysfunction to develop and for MRI and CSF abnormalities to be detectable. In conclusion, we should screen for V180I gCJD in elderly patients presenting with slowly progressive spastic paralysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.