ArticleAmerican journal of men's health
The SHARED Project: A Novel Approach to Engaging African American Men to Address Lung Cancer Disparities.
Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Feasibility of Establishing Community Living Labs (CoLLabs) to Improve Access to Prostate Health Resources, Education, Amenities, and Community Health: Protocol for a Pragmatic Clinical Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Patient and Healthcare Provider Barriers in the LDCT Lung Cancer Screening Continuum.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Solution-Based Research to Address Disparities in Precision Cancer Health: A Case Report Elucidating the Design and Rationale of the Illinois Cancer Health Equity Research (I-CHER) Center.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Community engagement in the context of cancer: scoping review of definitions and measures to inform program-level analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Novel Platforms of Education to Engage Black and African Americans in Lung Cancer Screening.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Racism, discrimination, medical mistrust, stigma, and lung cancer screening: a scoping review.Ethnicity & health · 2025Article
- Research for all: building a diverse researcher community for the All of Us Research Program.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators Impacting Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Among Black Veterans: A Qualitative Study.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2024Article
- Exploration of experiences and attitudes associated with lung health promotion among Black males with a history of smoking.Journal of men's health · 2024Article
- Examination of provider knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors associated with lung cancer screening among Black men receiving care at a federally qualified health center.Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare · 2023Article
- Equitable implementation of lung cancer screening: avoiding its potential to mirror existing inequities among people who use tobacco.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Stage of Diagnosis Among Adults Living in the Southeastern United States.Chest · 2023Observational
- Patient Navigation Can Improve Breast Cancer Outcomes among African American Women in Chicago: Insights from a Modeling Study.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2022Article
- Bias Issues in Colorectal Cancer Management: A Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Review
- Addressing Black men's oral health through community engaged research and workforce recruitment.Journal of public health dentistry · 2022Article
- Democratic and ethical problem of lung cancer screening: exclusion of true high-risk populations. Can it be fixed? Yes.BMJ open respiratory research · 2020Review
- Bridging the Gap: Engaging Black Men in Lung Cancer Research Through Barbershop Collaboration.American journal of men's healthArticle
- Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Preliminary Evaluation of a Citizen Scientist Educational Curriculum Aimed at Engaging Black Men in Lung Cancer Early Detection Screening.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Black men are disproportionately impacted by lung cancer morbidity and mortality. Low-dose helical computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening has demonstrated benefits for reducing lung cancer deaths by identifying cancers at earlier, more treatable stages. Despite the known benefits, LDCT screening is underutilized in black men. Studies in racially heterogeneous populations have found correlations between screening behaviors and factors such as physician trust, physician referral, and a desire to reduce the uncertainty of not knowing if they had lung cancer; yet little is known about the factors that specifically contribute to screening behaviors in black men. Community engagement strategies are beneficial for understanding barriers to health-care engagement. One community engagement approach is the citizen scientist model. Citizen scientists are lay people who are trained in research methods; they have proven valuable in increasing communities' knowledge of the importance of healthy behaviors such as screening, awareness of research, building trust in research, and improving study design and ethics. This paper proposes an intervention, grounded in community-based participatory research approaches and social network theory, to engage black men as citizen scientists in an effort to increase lung cancer screening in black men. This mixed-methods intervention will examine the attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs of black men related to uptake of evidence-based lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.