ReviewThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2021
Mobile Applications for Advance Care Planning: A Comprehensive Review of Features, Quality, Content, and Readability.
Review in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From inferring preferences to enabling choice: potentials of digital tools to improve substitute decision-making.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A Digital Serious Game (Anticip'action) to Support Advance Care Planning Discussions in the General Population: Usability Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour Towards Engaging with Advance Care Planning: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Chinese Diaspora.Journal of palliative care · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of digital tools in promoting advance care planning: a systematic review protocol.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Personalized and Interactive Web-Based Advance Care Planning Intervention for Older Adults (Koda Health): Pilot Feasibility Study.JMIR aging · 2024Article
- Are Mobile Applications in Laryngology Designed for All Patients?The Laryngoscope · 2023Review
- Effect of an app for promoting advance care planning and motivating patients to write their advance directives.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- A Mobile App for Advance Care Planning and Advance Directives (Accordons-nous): Development and Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Developing eHealth tools for diverse older adults: Lessons learned from the PREPARE for Your Care Program.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mobile applications that facilitate each stage of the advance care planning process (i.e., obtaining knowledge, contemplating options, and acting on decisions) may be one effective way to support patient-centered care and patient autonomy. The purpose of the current review was to identify and evaluate advance care planning mobile applications for patients. Our specific aim was to examine app features, design quality, content, and readability. We searched the Apple iOS and Google Play stores using keywords developed in conjunction with an academic librarian. Two coders with expertise in palliative care applied guidelines from a previous review and used a consensus coding procedure. We also calculated a Flesh Reading Ease score for each app. Nine apps met criteria and could be evaluated. Overall, apps are limited in features and poor in terms of design quality, layout, and functionality. Regarding content, most apps emphasize making decisions or taking action about advance care planning: 6 apps permit users to document a preferred decision maker, and 6 apps offer a mechanism to distribute and share advance care planning documentation. Three apps focus on knowledge about advance care planning, and only 4 support contemplation about advance care planning. Apps range in terms of readability, from very difficult to fairly easy. This review identifies limitations in features, design quality, and content of existing advance care planning mobile apps. We present recommendations based on the results of this review for the development of future advance care planning apps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.