Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32937973›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Robot-Aided Systems for Improving the Assessment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review.

Rubén de-la-Torre, Edwin Daniel Oña, Carlos Balaguer, Alberto Jardón

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05662878 (Evaluation of Hand Strength and Spasticity in Hemiplegic Patients Using Hand-Finger Robot Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05662878 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Hand Strength and Spasticity in Hemiplegic Patients Using Hand-Finger Robot Device

TypeobservationalSponsorAfyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled161ConditionsNeurological Rehabilitation, Stroke, Upper Extremity ProblemArmsAssessment of Hand Strength and Spasticity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Technology-assisted assessment of spasticity: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sensors Technology for Medical Robotics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rubén de-la-TorreDepartment of Systems Engineering and Automation, University Carlos III of Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6111-1850
Edwin Daniel OñaDepartment of Systems Engineering and Automation, University Carlos III of Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0791-860X
Carlos BalaguerDepartment of Systems Engineering and Automation, University Carlos III of Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4864-4625
Alberto JardónDepartment of Systems Engineering and Automation, University Carlos III of Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3734-7492
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid · ES

Funding

RoboCity2030-DIH-CM S2018/NMT-4331Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness DPI2017-87562-C2-1-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasticity is a motor disorder that causes stiffness or tightness of the muscles and can interfere with normal movement, speech, and gait. Traditionally, the spasticity assessment is carried out by clinicians using standardized procedures for objective evaluation. However, these procedures are manually performed and, thereby, they could be influenced by the clinician's subjectivity or expertise. The automation of such traditional methods for spasticity evaluation is an interesting and emerging field in neurorehabilitation. One of the most promising approaches is the use of robot-aided systems. In this paper, a systematic review of systems focused on the assessment of upper limb (UL) spasticity using robotic technology is presented. A systematic search and review of related articles in the literature were conducted. The chosen works were analyzed according to the morphology of devices, the data acquisition systems, the outcome generation method, and the focus of intervention (assessment and/or training). Finally, a series of guidelines and challenges that must be considered when designing and implementing fully-automated robot-aided systems for the assessment of UL spasticity are summarized.

Indexed as

Muscle SpasticityRoboticsHumansUpper Extremityassessmentcooperative robotsrobot-assisted rehabilitationspasticityupper limb

Identifiers

PMID32937973
PMCPMC7570987
OpenAlexW3085695824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.