Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32937887›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Dependencies of Surface Condensation on the Wettability and Nanostructure Size Differences.

Ming-Jun Liao, Li-Qiang Duan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ming-Jun LiaoSchool of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, National Thermal Power Engineering & Technology Research Center Key Laboratory of Power Station Energy Transfer Conversion and System (North China Electric Power University), North China Electric Power University, Ministry of Education, Beijing 102206, China.
Li-Qiang DuanSchool of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, National Thermal Power Engineering & Technology Research Center Key Laboratory of Power Station Energy Transfer Conversion and System (North China Electric Power University), North China Electric Power University, Ministry of Education, Beijing 102206, China.

Funding

Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 51821004the National Nature Science Foundation Project 51576062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When changing surface wettability and nanostructure size, condensation behavior displays distinct features. In this work, we investigated evaporation on a flat hydrophilic surface and condensation on both hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanostructured surfaces at the nanoscale using molecular dynamics simulations. The simulation results on hydrophilic surfaces indicated that larger groove widths and heights produced more liquid argon atoms, a quicker temperature response, and slower potential energy decline. These three characteristics closely relate to condensation areas or rates, which are determined by groove width and height. For condensation heat transfer, when the groove width was small, the change of groove height had little effect, while change of groove height caused a significant variation in the heat flux with a large groove width. When the cold wall was hydrophobic, the groove height became a significant impact factor, which caused no vapor atoms to condense in the groove with a larger height. The potential energy decreased with the increase of the groove height, which demonstrates a completely opposing trend when compared with hydrophilic surfaces.

Indexed as

condensationhydrophilic surfacehydrophobic surfacenanostructure size

Identifiers

PMID32937887
PMCPMC7559799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.