Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32937838›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

C-Terminal Extensions of Ku70 and Ku80 Differentially Influence DNA End Binding Properties.

Takabumi Inagawa, Thomas Wennink, Joyce H G Lebbink, Guido Keijzers, Bogdan I Florea, Nicole S Verkaik, Dik C van Gent

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recognition of DNA Lesions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. The Multifaceted Roles of Ku70/80.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takabumi InagawaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas WenninkDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joyce H G LebbinkDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Guido KeijzersDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9353-8042
Bogdan I FloreaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole S VerkaikDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dik C van GentDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1473-8148
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

Association for International Cancer Research AICR 02-071KWF Kankerbestrijding EMCR 2008-4045Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 700.57.005; VIDI 700.58.428; 175.010.2007.014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ku70/80 heterodimer binds to DNA ends and attracts other proteins involved in the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of DNA double-strand break repair. We developed a novel assay to measure DNA binding and release kinetics using differences in Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) of the ECFP-Ku70/EYFP-Ku80 heterodimer in soluble and DNA end bound states. We confirmed that the relative binding efficiencies of various DNA substrates (blunt, 3 nucleotide 5' extension, and DNA hairpin) measured in the FRET assay reflected affinities obtained from direct measurements using surface plasmon resonance. The FRET assay was subsequently used to investigate Ku70/80 behavior in the context of a DNA-dependent kinase (DNA-PK) holocomplex. As expected, this complex was much more stable than Ku70/80 alone, and its stability was influenced by DNA-PK phosphorylation status. Interestingly, the Ku80 C-terminal extension contributed to DNA-PK complex stability but was not absolutely required for its formation. The Ku70 C-terminal SAP domain, on the other hand, was required for the stable association of Ku70/80 to DNA ends, but this effect was abrogated in DNA-PK holocomplexes. We conclude that FRET measurements can be used to determine Ku70/80 binding kinetics. The ability to do this in complex mixtures makes this assay particularly useful to study larger NHEJ protein complexes on DNA ends.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNADNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferKu AutoantigenMiceNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationDNADNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsKu AutoantigenNuclear ProteinsXrcc5 protein, mouseXrcc6 protein, mouseDNA bindingDNA-PKDNA repairnon-homologous end-joiningsurface plasmon resonance (SPR)

Identifiers

PMID32937838
PMCPMC7555691
OpenAlexW3085556589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.