Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32937830›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

In Vitro Innovation of Tendon Tissue Engineering Strategies.

Maria Rita Citeroni, Maria Camilla Ciardulli, Valentina Russo, Giovanna Della Porta, Annunziata Mauro, Mohammad El Khatib, Miriam Di Mattia, Devis Galesso, Carlo Barbera, Nicholas R Forsyth and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cyclic mechanical stimulation of TDCs improves tendon tissue maturationFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Rita CiteroniUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Maria Camilla CiardulliDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi (SA), Italy.
Valentina RussoUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-2534
Giovanna Della PortaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi (SA), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1426-0159
Annunziata MauroUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3907-0244
Mohammad El KhatibUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0976-2522
Miriam Di MattiaUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2346-1064
Devis GalessoFidia Farmaceutici S.p.A., via Ponte della Fabbrica 3/A, 35031 Abano Terme (PD), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1193-8067
Carlo BarberaFidia Farmaceutici S.p.A., via Ponte della Fabbrica 3/A, 35031 Abano Terme (PD), Italy.
Nicholas R ForsythGuy Hilton Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Thornburrow Drive, Stoke on Trent ST4 7QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5156-4824
Nicola MaffulliDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi (SA), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5327-3702
Barbara BarboniUnit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0231-8066
University of Teramo · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITFidia Farmaceutici (Italy) · ITKeele University · GB

Funding

PON-RI 2014/2020 (CCI 2014IT16M2OP005), Fondo Sociale Europeo (FSE). Action I.1-"Innovative PhDs with industrial characterization" Cicle XXXIII (D.D. n 0001377 June 5th, 2017 additional PhD fellowships) C41I17000200006PON-RI 2014/2020 (CCI 2014IT16M2OP005), Fondo Sociale Europeo (FSE). Action I.1-"Innovative PhDs with industrial characterization" Cicle XXXIII (D.D. n 0001377 June 5th, 2017 additional PhD fellowships) C42F16000350001PON-RI 2014/2020 (CCI 2014IT16M2OP005), Fondo Sociale Europeo (FSE). Action I.1-"Innovative PhDs with industrial characterization" Cicle XXXIII (D.D. n 0001377 June 5th, 2017 additional PhD fellowships) D48G18000150006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tendinopathy is the term used to refer to tendon disorders. Spontaneous adult tendon healing results in scar tissue formation and fibrosis with suboptimal biomechanical properties, often resulting in poor and painful mobility. The biomechanical properties of the tissue are negatively affected. Adult tendons have a limited natural healing capacity, and often respond poorly to current treatments that frequently are focused on exercise, drug delivery, and surgical procedures. Therefore, it is of great importance to identify key molecular and cellular processes involved in the progression of tendinopathies to develop effective therapeutic strategies and drive the tissue toward regeneration. To treat tendon diseases and support tendon regeneration, cell-based therapy as well as tissue engineering approaches are considered options, though none can yet be considered conclusive in their reproduction of a safe and successful long-term solution for full microarchitecture and biomechanical tissue recovery. In vitro differentiation techniques are not yet fully validated. This review aims to compare different available tendon in vitro differentiation strategies to clarify the state of art regarding the differentiation process.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansRegenerationTendinopathyTendonsTissue EngineeringWound Healingin vitrostem cellstendon differentiation

Identifiers

PMID32937830
PMCPMC7555358
OpenAlexW3085647301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.