Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32937191›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2021

The Anticipation and Perception of Affective Touch in Women with and Recovered from Anorexia Nervosa.

Laura Crucianelli, Benedetta Demartini, Diana Goeta, Veronica Nisticò, Alkistis Saramandi, Sara Bertelli, Patrizia Todisco, Orsola Gambini, Aikaterini Fotopoulou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recovery From Anorexia Nervosa: A Concept Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026
    Review
  7. Centrality of Touch Avoidance in Social Touch Experiences in Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perceptual Dysfunction in Eating Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Correction.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Choice enhances touch pleasantness.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024
    Article
  15. Evolutionarily conserved neural responses to affective touch in monkeys transcend consciousness and change with age.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura CrucianelliDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: laura.crucianelli@ki.se.
Benedetta DemartiniDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Psychiatry Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, S. Paolo General Hospital, Milan, Italy; Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Italy.
Diana GoetaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Psychiatry Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, S. Paolo General Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Veronica NisticòDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Italy.
Alkistis SaramandiDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Sara BertelliPsychiatry Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, S. Paolo General Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia Todisco"Casa di Cura Villa Margherita", Arcugnano VI, Italy.
Orsola GambiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Psychiatry Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, S. Paolo General Hospital, Milan, Italy; Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Italy.
Aikaterini FotopoulouDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Ospedale San Paolo · ITUniversity College London · GBAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e CarloKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

European Research Council 818070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruptions in reward processing and anhedonia have long been observed in Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Interoceptive deficits have also been observed in AN, including reduced tactile pleasure. However, the extent to which this tactile anhedonia is specifically liked to an impairment in a specialised, interoceptive C-tactile system originating at the periphery, or a more top-down mechanism in the processing of tactile pleasantness remains debated. Here, we investigated differences between patients with and recovered from AN (RAN) and healthy controls (HC) in the perception of pleasantness of touch delivered in a CT-optimal versus a CT-non-optimal manner, and in their top-down, anticipatory beliefs about the perceived pleasantness of touch. To this end, we measured the anticipated pleasantness of various materials touching the skin and the perceived pleasantness of light, dynamic touch applied to the forearm of 27 women with AN, 24 women who have recovered and 30 HCs using C Tactile (CT) afferents-optimal (slow) and non-optimal (fast) velocities. Our results showed that both clinical groups anticipated tactile experiences and rated delivered tactile stimuli as less pleasant than HCs, but the latter difference was not related to the CT optimality of the stimulation. Instead, differences in the perception of CT-optimal touch were predicted by differences in top-down beliefs, alexithymia and interoceptive sensibility. Thus, tactile anhedonia in AN might persist as a trait even after otherwise successful recovery of AN and it is not linked to a bottom-up interoceptive deficit in the CT system, but rather to a learned, defective top-down anticipation of tactile pleasantness.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaTouch PerceptionFemaleHumansPhysical StimulationPleasureTouchaffective touchanhedoniaanorexia nervosainteroceptionpleasantnessreward

Identifiers

PMID32937191
PMCPMC7610818
OpenAlexW3086483078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.