Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936989›Full record

SynthesisHuman brain mapping2020

Shaky scaffolding: Age differences in cerebellar activation revealed through activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Jessica A Bernard, An D Nguyen, Hanna K Hausman, Ted Maldonado, Hannah K Ballard, T Bryan Jackson, Sydney M Eakin, Yana Lokshina, James R M Goen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Glial Cells and Aging: From the CNS to the Cerebellum.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Aging Impacts Basic Auditory and Timing Processes.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Ageing.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica A BernardDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7697-3675
An D NguyenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Hanna K HausmanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9694-9760
Ted MaldonadoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Hannah K BallardTexas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
T Bryan JacksonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6318-1916
Sydney M EakinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Yana LokshinaTexas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
James R M GoenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Texas A&M University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

A longitudinal investigation of the cerebellum in adulthood: anatomical and network changes, motor function, and cognitionR01AG064010 · NIA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, JESSICA ANN · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience research has provided foundational insights into aging, but has focused primarily on the cerebral cortex. However, the cerebellum is subject to the effects of aging. Given the importance of this structure in the performance of motor and cognitive tasks, cerebellar differences stand to provide critical insights into age differences in behavior. However, our understanding of cerebellar functional activation in aging is limited. Thus, we completed a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies across task domains. Unlike in the cortex where an increase in bilateral activation is seen during cognitive task performance with advanced age, there is less overlap in cerebellar activation across tasks in older adults (OAs) relative to young. Conversely, we see an increase in activation overlap in OAs during motor tasks. We propose that this is due to inputs for comparator processing in the context of control theory (cortical and spinal) that may be differentially impacted in aging. These findings advance our understanding of the aging mind and brain.

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingAdultAgedAgingCerebellumHumansLikelihood FunctionsMemoryMiddle AgedMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adultagingcerebellumcompensationmeta-analysisneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID32936989
PMCPMC7670650
OpenAlexW3087581853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.