Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936986›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2021

Dealing with care disruption in High and Intensive Care wards: From difficult patients to difficult situations.

Sylvia Gerritsen, Guy Widdershoven, Lia van der Ham, Laura van Melle, Martijn Kemper, Yolande Voskes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sylvia GerritsenDepartment of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7098-2423
Guy WiddershovenDepartment of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7620-6812
Lia van der HamLow Vision Research, Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5586-1631
Laura van MelleDepartment of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1607-5889
Martijn KemperGGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yolande VoskesDepartment of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-8892
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLGGZ inGeest · NLTilburg University · NLUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High and Intensive Care is a relatively new care model in Dutch mental health care for clinical admissions. One of the goals is to keep the admission short. For some patients, this goal is not realized, which results in a long-term admission. Often, this is experienced as a disruption. Disruptions in care processes are frequently defined in terms of patient characteristics. Yet, it may be that other factors play a role. The aim of this study is to gain better insight into the perceptions of care professionals of what is characteristic for disruptions at High and Intensive Care wards and how professionals can deal with these. Qualitative research was performed by means of semi-structured interviews and a focus group with professionals. Results show that a focus on patient characteristics is too narrow and that other factors also play an important role. These factors include challenges in the relation between professionals and the patient, a divided team, and a lack of collaboration with ambulatory care. In order to deal with these factors, professionals should invest in the relationship with the patient, identify destructive team processes early, and improve communication with ambulatory care. It is recommended to develop a monitoring tool that includes all these factors. Another recommendation is to organize structured reflection on dilemmas experienced in care. In conclusion, this study shows the importance of going beyond patient characteristics in order to better understand, identify, and deal with disruption at High and Intensive Care wards.

Indexed as

CommunicationCritical CareFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchInpatientsIntensive Care UnitsProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychiatryQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID32936986
PMCPMC7891438
OpenAlexW3085154489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.