Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936838›Full record

Trial reportPLoS pathogens2020

Emergence of genotype C1 Enterovirus A71 and its link with antigenic variation of virus in Taiwan.

Kuan-Ying A Huang, Peng-Nien Huang, Yhu-Chering Huang, Shu-Li Yang, Kuo-Chien Tsao, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, Shin-Ru Shih, Tzou-Yien Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS pathogens, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Enterovirus A71 antivirals: Past, present, and future.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Global emergence of Enterovirus 71: a systematic review.Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Inactivated enterovirus A71 vaccines and moving forward.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kuan-Ying A HuangDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6891-6945
Peng-Nien HuangResearch Center for Emerging Viral Infections, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yhu-Chering HuangDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Shu-Li YangDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Kuo-Chien TsaoDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hsun ChiuDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Shin-Ru ShihResearch Center for Emerging Viral Infections, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tzou-Yien LinDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang Gung University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An outbreak of the hand-foot-mouth disease with severe neurological cases, mainly caused by the genotype C1 enterovirus A71 (EV-A71), occurred in Taiwan between 2018 and early 2019. In the recent decade, the most dominant EV-A71 genotypes in Taiwan were B5 and C4 but changed to C1 in 2018. Antibody-mediated immunity plays a key role in limiting the EV-A71 illness in humans. However, the level of neutralizing activities against genotype C1 virus by human polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) remains largely unclear. In the study, we demonstrated that that 39% (9 in 23) of post-infection sera from the genotype B5- or C4-infected patients in 2014-2017 exhibit reduced titers with the 2018-2019 genotype C1 viruses than with the earlier B5 and C4 viruses tested. This finding with polyclonal sera is confirmed with human MAbs derived from genotype B5 virus-infected individuals. The 2018-2019 genotype C1 virus is resistant to the majority of canyon-targeting human MAbs, which may be associated with the residue change near or at the bottom of the canyon region on the viral capsid. The remaining three antibodies (16-2-11B, 16-3-4D, and 17-1-12A), which target VP1 S241 on the 5-fold vertex, VP3 E81 on the 3-fold plateau and VP2 D84 on the 2-fold plateau of genotype C1 viral capsid, respectively, retained neutralizing activities with variable potencies. These neutralizing antibodies were also found to be protective against a lethal challenge of the 2018-2019 genotype C1 virus in an hSCARB2-transgenic mice model. These results indicate that the EV-A71-specific antibody response may consist of a fraction of poorly neutralizing antibodies against 2018-2019 genotype C1 viruses among a subset of previously infected individuals. Epitope mapping of protective antibodies that recognize the emerging genotype C1 virus has implications for anti-EV-A71 MAbs and the vaccine field.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, ViralGenotypeAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralChildChild, PreschoolEnterovirus A, HumanFemaleHand, Foot and Mouth DiseaseHumansMaleMiceMice, TransgenicAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32936838
PMCPMC7521691
OpenAlexW3087172442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.