Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936818›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) efficacy of rifampin, rifapentine, moxifloxacin, minocycline, and clarithromycin in a susceptible-subclinical model of leprosy.

Shannon M Lenz, Jaymes H Collins, Nashone A Ray, Deanna A Hagge, Ramanuj Lahiri, Linda B Adams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Unraveling Drug Resistance inInternational journal of microbiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Leprosy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shannon M LenzIHRC, Inc. Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5705-1819
Jaymes H CollinsDepartment of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, National Hansen's Disease Programs-Laboratory Research Branch, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7509-0109
Nashone A RayDepartment of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, National Hansen's Disease Programs-Laboratory Research Branch, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
Deanna A HaggeMycobacterial Research Laboratories, Anandaban Hospital, The Leprosy Mission Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-3792-2266
Ramanuj LahiriDepartment of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, National Hansen's Disease Programs-Laboratory Research Branch, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
Linda B AdamsDepartment of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, National Hansen's Disease Programs-Laboratory Research Branch, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6265-3531
Health Resources and Services Administration · USAnandaban Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubclinical infection with Mycobacterium leprae is one potential source of leprosy transmission, and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimens have been proposed to control this source. Because PEP trials require considerable investment, we applied a sensitive variation of the kinetic mouse footpad (MFP) screening assay to aid in the choice of drugs and regimens for clinical trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsAthymic nude mice were inoculated in the footpad (FP) with 6 x 103 viable M. leprae and treated by gastric gavage with a single dose of Rifampin (SDR), Rifampin + Ofloxacin + Minocycline (SD-ROM), or Rifapentine + Minocycline + Moxifloxacin (SD-PMM) or with the proposed PEP++ regimen of three once-monthly doses of Rifampin + Moxifloxacin (RM), Rifampin + Clarithromycin (RC), Rifapentine + Moxifloxacin (PM), or Rifapentine + Clarithromycin (PC). At various times post-treatment, DNA was purified from the FP, and M. leprae were enumerated by RLEP quantitative PCR. A regression analysis was calculated to determine the expected RLEP value if 99.9% of the bacilli were killed after the administration of each regimen. SDR and SD-ROM induced little growth delay in this highly susceptible murine model of subclinical infection. In contrast, SD-PMM delayed measurable M. leprae growth above the inoculum by 8 months. The four multi-dose regimens delayed bacterial growth for >9months post-treatment cessation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The delay in discernable M. leprae growth post-treatment was an excellent indicator of drug efficacy for both early (3-4 months) and late (8-9 months) drug efficacy. Our data indicates that multi-dose PEP may be required to control infection in highly susceptible individuals with subclinical leprosy to prevent disease and decrease transmission.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsymptomatic InfectionsBacterial LoadClarithromycinDrug CombinationsLeprostatic AgentsLeprosyMiceMice, NudeMinocyclineMoxifloxacinMycobacterium lepraePost-Exposure ProphylaxisRifampinClarithromycinDrug CombinationsLeprostatic AgentsMinocyclineMoxifloxacinRifampinrifapentine

Identifiers

PMID32936818
PMCPMC7494095
OpenAlexW3087703540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.