Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936420›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Development and validation of a computed tomography index for assessing outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis: "SMART-CT" index.

Pankaj Gupta, Praveen Kumar-M, Mansi Verma, Vishal Sharma, Jayanta Samanta, Harshal Mandavdhare, Saroj K Sinha, Usha Dutta, Rakesh Kochhar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pankaj GuptaGE Radiology, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India. Pankajgupta959@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3914-3757
Praveen Kumar-MDepartment of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Mansi VermaGE Radiology, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Vishal SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Jayanta SamantaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Harshal MandavdhareDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Saroj K SinhaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Usha DuttaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Rakesh KochharDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe existing CT indices do not allow quantitative prediction of clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to develop and validate a revised CT index using a nomogram-based approach.

methodsThis retrospective study comprised consecutive patients with AP who underwent contrast-enhanced CT between June 2017 and March 2019. 123 CT scans were randomly divided into training (n = 103) and validation groups (n = 20). Two radiologists analyzed CT scans for findings described in modified CT severity index and additional exploratory items (13 items). Seven items (pancreatic necrosis, number of collections, size of collections, ascites, pleural effusion, celiac artery involvement, and liver steatosis) found to be statistically significant were used for development of index. Synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was employed to balance representation of minority classes and hence this index was named "SMOTE Application for Reading CT in AcuTe Pancreatitis (SMART-CT index)". Binomial logistic regression was used for development of prediction algorithm. Nomograms were then created and validated for each outcome.

resultsThe new CT index had area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 [95% CI 0.65-0.93], 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.77), 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.85), 0.83 (95% CI 0.69-0.96), 0.70 (95% CI 0.60-0.81), and 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.75) for mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospitalization, length of ICU stay, number of admissions, and severity, respectively. The AUC of validation cohort was comparable to the training cohort.

conclusionThe novel nomogram-based index predicts occurrence of clinical outcome with moderate accuracy.

Indexed as

Pancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute DiseaseHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAcute pancreatitisComputed tomographyCT indexPrediction algorithmPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.