Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936419›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Predictive value of initial imaging and staging with long-term outcomes in young adults diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

Jeremy R Burt, Jeffrey Waltz, Ashley Ramirez, Andres Abadia, Basel Yacoub, Sydney A Burt, Fiona Tissavirasingham, Madison R Kocher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeremy R BurtDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 210, MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. Burtje@musc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4169-1015
Jeffrey WaltzDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 210, MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Ashley RamirezSchool of Medicine, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
Andres AbadiaDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 210, MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Basel YacoubDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 210, MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Sydney A BurtDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 210, MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Fiona TissavirasinghamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Canton Medical Education Foundation, 2600 6th St SW, Canton, OH, 44710, USA.
Madison R KocherDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 210, MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate how initial abdominopelvic CT findings and staging correlate with outcomes in a cohort of patients aged 18-40 years.

methodsWe evaluated all young adult patients at a single tertiary center diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed CRC who also had CT of the abdomen and pelvis at the time of initial diagnosis. Demographics, symptoms, CT findings, staging, treatments, and outcomes at 1 year and 5 years were recorded.

resultsOf 91 patients who met initial inclusion criteria, 81.8% had a mass present on CT, with an average size of 4.8 cm ± 2.9. A majority of patients were surgical stage III or IV (64.3%). Advanced AJCC stage was more common with rectal tumors and metastatic disease on initial CT (p < 0.0001). In a subgroup analysis, almost all patients initially staged 4A or higher had progression of disease. At the final follow-up visit, by RECIST 1.1 criteria, 58.8% had progressive disease, 35.3% complete response, and 3.9% stable disease. The overall 5-year survival rate in this subgroup was 40% with lower survival probability with increasing stage (p = 0.0001).

conclusionMost young adult patients presented with large tumors on imaging, increasing the likelihood of identification on CT. Tumors initially presenting in the rectum with enlarged lymph nodes and/or with distant metastases on CT were more often associated with advanced surgical stage and poorer prognosis. A majority of patients presented at an advanced stage, most commonly stage 4A, and had progression of disease at follow-up.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingRectumTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultAbdominopelvic CTColorectal cancerStagingYoung patients

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.