ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021
Predictive value of initial imaging and staging with long-term outcomes in young adults diagnosed with colorectal cancer.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion and T-staging of rectal cancer via a dual-energy computed tomography iodine map: a feasibility study.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate how initial abdominopelvic CT findings and staging correlate with outcomes in a cohort of patients aged 18-40 years.
methodsWe evaluated all young adult patients at a single tertiary center diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed CRC who also had CT of the abdomen and pelvis at the time of initial diagnosis. Demographics, symptoms, CT findings, staging, treatments, and outcomes at 1 year and 5 years were recorded.
resultsOf 91 patients who met initial inclusion criteria, 81.8% had a mass present on CT, with an average size of 4.8 cm ± 2.9. A majority of patients were surgical stage III or IV (64.3%). Advanced AJCC stage was more common with rectal tumors and metastatic disease on initial CT (p < 0.0001). In a subgroup analysis, almost all patients initially staged 4A or higher had progression of disease. At the final follow-up visit, by RECIST 1.1 criteria, 58.8% had progressive disease, 35.3% complete response, and 3.9% stable disease. The overall 5-year survival rate in this subgroup was 40% with lower survival probability with increasing stage (p = 0.0001).
conclusionMost young adult patients presented with large tumors on imaging, increasing the likelihood of identification on CT. Tumors initially presenting in the rectum with enlarged lymph nodes and/or with distant metastases on CT were more often associated with advanced surgical stage and poorer prognosis. A majority of patients presented at an advanced stage, most commonly stage 4A, and had progression of disease at follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32936419What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.