Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936362›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2020

Spatial activity participation in childhood and adolescence: consistency and relations to spatial thinking in adolescence.

Emily Grossnickle Peterson, Adam B Weinberger, David H Uttal, Bob Kolvoord, Adam E Green

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Developing a novel measure of non-rigid, ductile spatial skill.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Emily Grossnickle PetersonSchool of Education, American University, Washington, DC, 20016, USA. epeterso@american.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9548-6274
Adam B WeinbergerDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
David H UttalCollege of Integrated Science and Engineering, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA.
Bob KolvoordDepartment of Psychology and Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Adam E GreenPenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
American University · USGeorgetown University · USJames Madison University · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior research has revealed positive effects of spatial activity participation (e.g., playing with blocks, sports) on current and future spatial skills. However, research has not examined the degree to which spatial activity participation remains stable over time, and little is known about how participating in spatial activities at multiple points in development impacts spatial thinking. In this study, adolescents completed measures of spatial thinking and questionnaires assessing their current and previous participation in spatial activities.

resultsParticipation in childhood spatial activities predicted adolescent spatial activity participation, and the relation was stronger for females than for males. Adolescents' current participation in spatial activities predicted spatial thinking skills, whereas participation in childhood spatial activities predicted adolescents' spatial habits of mind, even when accounting for factors such as gender and academic performance. No cumulative benefit was incurred due to participating in spatial activities in both childhood and adolescence, and a lack of spatial activities in childhood was not made up for by later spatial activity participation.

conclusionsThese findings reveal a consistently positive relationship in spatial activity participation between childhood and adolescence. Results highlight the importance of participating in spatial activities during childhood, and underscore the differential impact that participation in spatial activities during childhood versus adolescence has on different facets of adolescents' spatial thinking. Implications for the timing of interventions is discussed.

Indexed as

Play and PlaythingsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAdolescent DevelopmentChildChild BehaviorChild DevelopmentFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceSex FactorsSpatial BehaviorThinkingSex differencesSpatial activitiesSpatial cognitionSpatial skills

Identifiers

PMID32936362
PMCPMC7494723
OpenAlexW3087554349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.