Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936347›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020

Collection and use of EQ-5D for follow-up, decision-making, and quality improvement in health care - the case of the Swedish National Quality Registries.

Olivia Ernstsson, Mathieu F Janssen, Emelie Heintz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06568029 (Construct Validity and Responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L in Patients With Rheumatic Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06568029 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Construct Validity and Responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L in Patients With Rheumatic Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2024 to 2024Enrolled77,651ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis, Polyarthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing SpondylitisArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Construct validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in psoriatic arthritis: an evaluation based on the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Multinational stakeholder engagement to inform future development and refinement of the EuroQol toddler and infant populations (EQ-TIPS).The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Patient acceptable symptom state and treatment failure threshold values for work productivity and activity Impairment and EQ-5D-5L in osteoarthritis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  14. Healthcare consumer acceptability of routine use of the EQ-5D-5L in clinical care: a cross-sectional survey.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olivia ErnstssonDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. olivia.ernstsson@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8920-1372
Mathieu F JanssenSection Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
Emelie HeintzDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare 2015-01331 2015-01331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Swedish National Quality Registries (NQRs) contain individual-level health care data for specific patient populations, or patients receiving specific interventions. Approximately 90% of the 105 Swedish NQRs include any patient-reported outcome measure, with EQ-5D being the most common. As there has been no general overview of EQ-5D data within the NQRs, this study fills a knowledge gap by reporting how the data are collected, presented, and used at different levels of the Swedish health care system.

methodsAll 46 NQRs with a license for the use of EQ-5D were included. Information was retrieved from the registries' annual reports or from websites, using a template that was subsequently sent to each registry for completion and confirmation. If considered necessary, the contact was followed-up with an interview, either in-person or over the telephone. The uses of EQ-5D were categorised as denoting usage for follow-up, decision-making, or quality improvement in Swedish health care.

resultsIn total, 41 of the 46 licensed registries reported collection of EQ-5D data. EQ-5D is most commonly collected within registries related to the musculoskeletal system, but it has a wide application also in other disease areas. Thirty-six registries provide EQ-5D results to patients, clinicians, or other decision-makers. Twenty-two of the registries reported that EQ-5D data are being used for follow-up, decision-making or quality improvement. The registries most commonly reported use of data for assessing interventions, and in quality indicators to follow-up the quality of care at a national level.

conclusionCollection and use of EQ-5D data vary across the Swedish NQRs, which may partly be accounted for by the different purposes of the registries. The provided examples of use illustrate how EQ-5D data can inform decisions at different levels of the health care system. However, there is potential for improving the use of EQ-5D data.

Indexed as

EQ-5DHealth-related quality of lifePatient-reported outcome measuresPROMQuality improvementQuality registriesRoutine measurement

Identifiers

PMID32936347
PMCPMC7494720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.