Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936300›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2022

Modeled Air Pollution from In Situ Burning and Flaring of Oil and Gas Released Following the Deepwater Horizon Disaster.

Gregory C Pratt, Mark R Stenzel, Richard K Kwok, Caroline P Groth, Sudipto Banerjee, Susan F Arnold, Lawrence S Engel, Dale P Sandler, Patricia A Stewart

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exposure Group Development in Support of the NIEHS GuLF Study.Annals of work exposures and health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gregory C PrattUniversity of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health, 420 Delaware St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Mark R StenzelExposure Assessment Applications, LLC, 6045 27th St N, Arlington, VA 22207, USA.
Richard K KwokEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, P.O. Box 12233, MD A3-05, 111 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 22709, USA.
Caroline P GrothDepartment of Biostatistics, West Virginia University School of Public Health, 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9190, Morgantown, WV 26506-9190, USA.
Sudipto BanerjeeUniversity of California-Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Suite: 51-254 CHS, 650 charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Susan F ArnoldUniversity of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health, 420 Delaware St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Lawrence S EngelEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, P.O. Box 12233, MD A3-05, 111 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 22709, USA.
Dale P SandlerEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, P.O. Box 12233, MD A3-05, 111 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 22709, USA.
Patricia A StewartStewart Exposure Assessments, LLC, 6045 27th St N, Arlington, VA 22207, USA.

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Gulf Longitudinal Follow-up (GuLF) Worker StudyZIAES102945 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 2010 to 2025
$15.3M
Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Large Spatially and Temporally Misaligned Data in Environmental Health ApplicationsR01ES027027 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BANERJEE, SUDIPTO · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Flexible Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Estimating Inhalation ExposuresR01ES030210 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BANERJEE, SUDIPTO · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027027NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030210NIEHS NIH HHS ZO1 ES 102945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GuLF STUDY, initiated by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, is investigating the health effects among workers involved in the oil spill response and clean-up (OSRC) after the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) explosion in April 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico. Clean-up included in situ burning of oil on the water surface and flaring of gas and oil captured near the seabed and brought to the surface. We estimated emissions of PM2.5 and related pollutants resulting from these activities, as well as from engines of vessels working on the OSRC. PM2.5 emissions ranged from 30 to 1.33e6 kg per day and were generally uniform over time for the flares but highly episodic for the in situ burns. Hourly emissions from each source on every burn/flare day were used as inputs to the AERMOD model to develop average and maximum concentrations for 1-, 12-, and 24-h time periods. The highest predicted 24-h average concentrations sometimes exceeded 5000 µg m-3 in the first 500 m downwind of flaring and reached 71 µg m-3 within a kilometer of some in situ burns. Beyond 40 km from the DWH site, plumes appeared to be well mixed, and the predicted 24-h average concentrations from the flares and in situ burns were similar, usually below 10 µg m-3. Structured averaging of model output gave potential PM2.5 exposure estimates for OSRC workers located in various areas across the Gulf. Workers located nearest the wellhead (hot zone/source workers) were estimated to have a potential maximum 12-h exposure of 97 µg m-3 over the 2-month flaring period. The potential maximum 12-h exposure for workers who participated in in situ burns was estimated at 10 µg m-3 over the ~3-month burn period. The results suggest that burning of oil and gas during the DWH clean-up may have resulted in PM2.5 concentrations substantially above the U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standard for PM2.5 (24-h average = 35 µg m-3). These results are being used to investigate possible adverse health effects in the GuLF STUDY epidemiologic analysis of PM2.5 exposures.

Indexed as

Air PollutionDisastersOccupational ExposurePetroleum PollutionHumansParticulate MatterParticulate MatterDeepwater Horizonoil spillPM2.5 concentrationsPM2.5 exposureworker exposure

Identifiers

PMID32936300
PMCPMC8989033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.