ArticleJAMA network open2020
Association of a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Death From Breast Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Guideline
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Therapy and Endocrine Therapy for DCIS: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the NSABP B-35 Randomized Clinical Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Trial
- 5-year results of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) and exactrac adaptive gating (NovalisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021Trial
- Radiotherapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Toxicity, Quality of Life, and Decisional Regret at a Tertiary Cancer Center.Cancers · 2026Article
- Transcriptome predictors of second breast events in ductal carcinoma in situ: a case‒control study including Black and White women.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Cause-specific mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: Associations with screening and socio-economic status.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Achieve Complete Registration of Danish Patients with Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast, 2008-2023.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of two major population-based breast cancer screening programmes in China: a model-based economic evaluation.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Circulating tumor cells as predictive biomarkers in the risk stratification of DCIS: Evidence of early dissemination.Science advances · 2025Article
- Trends in breast cancer death rates from ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive cancer in the United States.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- AI-Based Ultrasound Nomogram for Differentiating Invasive from Non-Invasive Breast Cancer Masses.Cancers · 2025Article
- Multiplex characterization of circulating tumor cells from ductal carcinoma in situ patients suggests early tumor dissemination.Cancer letters · 2025Article
- Risk perception of patients with ductal carcinomaHistology and histopathology · 2025Review
- Article
- How much do we know about the metastatic process?Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024Review
- Radiology for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Updates on Invasive Cancer Progression and Active Monitoring.Korean journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Ductal carcinoma in situ and cause-specific mortality among younger and older postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Tumor microenvironmental determinants of high-risk DCIS progression.Research square · 2024Article
- Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: It is not clear to what extent a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts a woman's lifetime risk of dying of breast cancer. Under ideal circumstances, treatment will eliminate the risk of invasive ipsilateral recurrence and prevent subsequent mortality from breast cancer. The risk of dying of breast cancer after a diagnosis of DCIS had not been compared with that of women without cancer in the general population. Objective: To determine the risk of death from breast cancer in a large cohort of patients treated for DCIS and to compare the risk with that of women in the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included data for women who had first primary DCIS diagnosed between 1995 and 2014 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries database. Women with DCIS underwent surgical treatment, and approximately half also received radiotherapy. These women were followed from the date of DCIS diagnosis until death from breast cancer or date of last follow-up. Women in the general population without breast cancer were analyzed as controls. Follow-up information was available up to December 2016. The data were analyzed in March 2020. Exposures: Patients with DCIS who underwent surgical treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Breast cancer death was the main outcome. Standardized mortality ratios were estimated by comparing deaths from breast cancer among women diagnosed with DCIS with expected deaths from breast cancer among women in the general population who did not have cancer. Expected probability of death from breast cancer in the general population was calculated by an incidence-based mortality approach using standardized SEER-based incidence and case-fatality rates. Probability of breast cancer death was estimated based on the assumption that a cancer-free control was cancer free on the date the woman with DCIS was diagnosed and was studied until the end of follow-up. Results: A total of 144 524 women diagnosed with first primary DCIS were included (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 57.4 [11.0] years). There were 1540 deaths from breast cancer in the cohort. Based on SEER-based incidence and case-fatality rates, 458 breast cancer deaths were expected in an equivalent number of cancer-free women from the general population with equal follow-up. The standardized mortality ratio for death from breast cancer among women with DCIS was 3.36 (95% CI, 3.20-3.53). The elevated risk of death persisted more than 15 years after diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: In the population studied, the risk of dying of breast cancer was increased 3-fold after a diagnosis of DCIS. This suggests that our current treatment focus on preventing invasive recurrence is insufficient to eliminate all deaths from breast cancer after DCIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.