Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936216›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2020

Association of Breast Cancer Surgery With Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-being in Young Breast Cancer Survivors.

Shoshana M Rosenberg, Laura S Dominici, Shari Gelber, Philip D Poorvu, Kathryn J Ruddy, Julia S Wong, Rulla M Tamimi, Lidia Schapira, Steven Come, Jeffrey M Peppercorn and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01468246 active not recruitingnot on this map

Helping Ourselves, Helping Others: The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2006 to 2035Enrolled1,302ConditionsBreast Cancer
NCT06425874 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Socioeconomic Determinants on the Patient Reported Outcomes in Young Breast Cancer Patients After Breast Surgery: an Observational Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2024 to 2035Enrolled1,000ConditionsBreast Cancer, Surgery, Quality of LifeArmsBreast-conserving surgery, Mastectomy, Mastectomy with reconstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sexual dysfunction in women with breast cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. The effects of staged sexual health education on sexual and mental health in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. User profiles of young breast cancer survivors on Chinese social media: machine learning-based text mining analysis study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  19. "Going Flat" After Mastectomy: A Social Media Analysis of Patient Perspectives and Educational Needs.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shoshana M RosenbergDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura S DominiciBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shari GelberDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Philip D PoorvuDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kathryn J RuddyMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Julia S WongDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rulla M TamimiBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lidia SchapiraStanford University, Stanford, California.
Steven ComeBeth Israel Deaconess, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey M PeppercornMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Virginia F BorgesUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver.
Ann H PartridgeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Improving surgical decision-making in young women with breast cancerK01HS023680 · AHRQ · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI ROSENBERG, SHOSHANA M · 2015 to 2019
$594k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS023680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Young women with breast cancer are increasingly choosing bilateral mastectomy (BM), yet little is known about short-term and long-term physical and psychosocial well-being following surgery in this population. Objective: To evaluate the differential associations of surgery with quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial outcomes from 1 to 5 years following diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort study. Setting: Multicenter, including academic and community hospitals in North America. Participants: Women age ≤40 when diagnosed with Stage 0-3 with unilateral breast cancer between 2006 and 2016 who had surgery and completed QOL and psychosocial assessments. Exposures (for observational studies): Primary breast surgery including breast-conserving surgery (BCS), unilateral mastectomy (UM), and BM. Main Outcomes and Measures: Physical functioning, body image, sexual health, anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed in follow-up. Results: Of 826 women, mean age at diagnosis was 36.1 years; most women were White non-Hispanic (86.7%). Regarding surgery, 45% had BM, 31% BCS, and 24% UM. Of women who had BM/UM, 84% had reconstruction. While physical functioning, sexuality, and body image improved over time, sexuality and body image were consistently worse (higher adjusted mean scores) among women who had BM vs BCS (body image: year 1, 1.32 vs 0.64; P < .001; year 5, 1.19 vs 0.48; P < .001; sexuality: year 1, 1.66 vs 1.20, P < .001; year 5, 1.43 vs 0.96; P < .001) or UM (body image: year 1, 1.32 vs 1.15; P = .06; year 5, 1.19 vs 0.96; P = .02; sexuality: year 1, 1.66 vs 1.41; P = .02; year 5, 1.43 vs 1.09; P = .002). Anxiety improved across groups, but adjusted mean scores remained higher among women who had BM vs BCS/UM at 1 year (BM, 7.75 vs BCS, 6.94; P = .005; BM, 7.75 vs UM, 6.58; P = .005), 2 years (BM, 7.47 vs BCS, 6.18; P < .001; BM, 7.47 vs UM, 6.07; P < .001) and 5 years (BM, 6.67 vs BCS, 5.91; P = .05; BM, 6.67 vs UM, 5.79; P = .05). There were minimal between-group differences in depression levels in follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance: While QOL improves over time, young breast cancer survivors who undergo more extensive surgery have worse body image, sexual health, and anxiety compared with women undergoing less extensive surgery. Ensuring young women are aware of the short-term and long-term effects of surgery and receive support when making surgical decisions is warranted.

Indexed as

Psychosocial FunctioningQuality of LifeAdultAge FactorsAnxietyBody ImageBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMastectomy

Identifiers

PMID32936216
PMCPMC7495332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.