Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936087›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Mobile Breast Cancer e-Support Program for Chinese Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy (Part 3): Secondary Data Analysis.

Haihua Zhu, Xiuwan Chen, Jinqiu Yang, Qiaoling Wu, Jiemin Zhu, Sally Wai-Chi Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Electronic Health Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Updates in Cancer Rehabilitation Telehealth.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Haihua Zhu *Nursing Department, First Affiliated Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2083-9340
Xiuwan Chen *Nursing Department, First Affiliated Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9478-7323
Jinqiu Yang *Department of Nursing, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0236-5367
Qiaoling Wu *Hospital Infection Management Office, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5656-2788
Jiemin ZhuDepartment of Nursing, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9705-9575
Sally Wai-Chi ChanGlobal Engagement and Partnership Division, UON Singapore campus, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5484-4645
First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University · CNXiamen University · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNNewcastle University Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany app-based interventions targeting women with breast cancer have been developed and tested for effectiveness. However, information regarding the evaluation of the usage of these interventions is scarce. A better understanding of usage data is important to determine how women use apps and how these interventions affect health outcomes.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the usage duration and login frequency of an app-based intervention, the Breast Cancer e-Support (BCS) program, and to investigate the association between usage data and participants' demographic and medical characteristics.

methodsThis study is a secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of the BCS program. The BCS program contains four modules: Learning Forum, Discussion Forum, Ask-the-Expert Forum, and Your Story Forum. A total of 57 women in the intervention group accessed the BCS program during their 12-week chemotherapy. The app's background system tracked the usage duration and login frequency for each forum and the entire BCS program.

resultsThe total usage duration per participant ranged from 0 to 9371 minutes, and the login frequency per participant ranged from 0 to 774 times. The Discussion Forum and the Learning Forum were the most frequently used modules. The general linear model showed that age, education, family monthly income, and employment were associated with BCS usage duration and/or login frequency. Age (F

conclusionsOverall, this study found considerable variability in the usage of app-based interventions. When health care professionals incorporate app-based interventions into their routine care for women with breast cancer, the learning and discussion functions of apps should be strengthened to promote engagement. Additionally, characteristics of women with breast cancer, such as age, level of education, income, and employment status, should be taken in consideration to develop tailored apps that address their particular needs and therefore improve their engagement with the app.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000639426; http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12616000639426.aspx.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMobile ApplicationsAustraliaChinaData AnalysisFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbreast cancerchemotherapymHealthmobile app

Identifiers

PMID32936087
PMCPMC7527913
OpenAlexW3048028467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.