Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936084›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Identifying Key Predictors of Cognitive Dysfunction in Older People Using Supervised Machine Learning Techniques: Observational Study.

Debbie Rankin, Michaela Black, Bronac Flanagan, Catherine F Hughes, Adrian Moore, Leane Hoey, Jonathan Wallace, Chris Gill, Paul Carlin, Anne M Molloy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Debbie RankinSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Derry~Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-0599
Michaela BlackSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Derry~Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-2566
Bronac FlanaganSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Derry~Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9697-7478
Catherine F HughesSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-6654
Adrian MooreSchool of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9313-909X
Leane HoeySchool of Biomedical Sciences, Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-2155
Jonathan WallaceSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8415-4001
Chris GillSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-7571
Paul CarlinSchool of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open University, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-4125
Anne M MolloySchool of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1688-9049
Conal CunninghamMercers Institute for Research on Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-2272
Helene McNultySchool of Biomedical Sciences, Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4366-6457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning techniques, specifically classification algorithms, may be effective to help understand key health, nutritional, and environmental factors associated with cognitive function in aging populations.

objectiveThis study aims to use classification techniques to identify the key patient predictors that are considered most important in the classification of poorer cognitive performance, which is an early risk factor for dementia.

methodsData were used from the Trinity-Ulster and Department of Agriculture study, which included detailed information on sociodemographic, clinical, biochemical, nutritional, and lifestyle factors in 5186 older adults recruited from the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, a proportion of whom (987/5186, 19.03%) were followed up 5-7 years later for reassessment. Cognitive function at both time points was assessed using a battery of tests, including the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), with a score <70 classed as poorer cognitive performance. This study trained 3 classifiers-decision trees, Naïve Bayes, and random forests-to classify the RBANS score and to identify key health, nutritional, and environmental predictors of cognitive performance and cognitive decline over the follow-up period. It assessed their performance, taking note of the variables that were deemed important for the optimized classifiers for their computational diagnostics.

resultsIn the classification of a low RBANS score (<70), our models performed well (F

conclusionsThe results suggest that it may be possible for a health care professional to make an initial evaluation, with a high level of confidence, of the potential for cognitive dysfunction using only a few short, noninvasive questions, thus providing a quick, efficient, and noninvasive way to help them decide whether or not a patient requires a full cognitive evaluation. This approach has the potential benefits of making time and cost savings for health service providers and avoiding stress created through unnecessary cognitive assessments in low-risk patients.

Indexed as

agingclassificationcognitiondietgeriatric assessmentsupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID32936084
PMCPMC7527918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.