Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32936083›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Testing Wearable UV Sensors to Improve Sun Protection in Young Adults at an Outdoor Festival: Field Study.

Caitlin Horsham, Jodie Antrobus, Catherine M Olsen, Helen Ford, David Abernethy, Elke Hacker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Objectively-Assessed Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure and Sunburn Occurrence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Wearable ultraviolet radiation sensors for research and personal use.International journal of biometeorology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Attitudes and Behaviors That Impact Skin Cancer Risk among Men.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin HorshamSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0354-3583
Jodie AntrobusPreventive Health Branch, Queensland Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0781-0674
Catherine M OlsenPopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4483-1888
Helen FordSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8011-4582
David AbernethySchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5736-5874
Elke HackerSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2759-8244
Queensland University of Technology · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUQueensland Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAustralia and New Zealand have the highest skin cancer incidence rates worldwide, and sun exposure is the main risk factor for developing skin cancer. Sun exposure during childhood and adolescence is a critical factor in developing skin cancer later in life.

objectiveThis study aims to test the effectiveness of wearable UV sensors to increase sun protection habits (SPH) and prevent sunburn in adolescents.

methodsDuring the weeklong school leavers outdoor festival (November 2019) at the Gold Coast, Australia, registered attendees aged 15-19 years were recruited into the field study. Participants were provided with a wearable UV sensor and free sunscreen. The primary outcome was sun exposure practices using the SPH index. Secondary outcomes were self-reported sunburns, sunscreen use, and satisfaction with the wearable UV sensor.

resultsA total of 663 participants were enrolled in the study, and complete data were available for 188 participants (188/663, 28.4% response rate). Participants provided with a wearable UV sensor significantly improved their use of sunglasses (P=.004) and sunscreen use both on the face (P<.001) and on other parts of the body (P=.005). However, the use of long-sleeve shirts (P<.001) and the use of a hat (P<.001) decreased. During the study period, 31.4% (59/188) of the participants reported receiving one or more sunburns. Satisfaction with the wearable UV sensor was high, with 73.4% (138/188) of participants reporting the UV sensor was helpful to remind them to use sun protection.

conclusionsDevices that target health behaviors when outdoors, such as wearable UV sensors, may improve use of sunscreen and sunglasses in adolescents.

Indexed as

HolidaysWearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandYoung Adultadolescentshealth promotionmelanomapreventive medicinepublic healthsunburnsunlight

Identifiers

PMID32936083
PMCPMC7531871
OpenAlexW3087124699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.