ArticleProteins2021
Consistency and variation of protein subcellular location annotations.
Article in Proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of protein subcellular localization in single cells.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Computational identification of surface markers for isolating distinct subpopulations from heterogeneous cancer cell populations.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Computational identification of surface markers for isolating distinct subpopulations from heterogeneous cancer cell populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in the Prediction of Subcellular Localization of Proteins and Related Topics.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Improving Protein Subcellular Location Classification by Incorporating Three-Dimensional Structure Information.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Convolutional Neural Network-Based Artificial Intelligence for Classification of Protein Localization Patterns.Biomolecules · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A major challenge for protein databases is reconciling information from diverse sources. This is especially difficult when some information consists of secondary, human-interpreted rather than primary data. For example, the Swiss-Prot database contains curated annotations of subcellular location that are based on predictions from protein sequence, statements in scientific articles, and published experimental evidence. The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) consists of millions of high-resolution microscopic images that show protein spatial distribution on a cellular and subcellular level. These images are manually annotated with protein subcellular locations by trained experts. The image annotations in HPA can capture the variation of subcellular location across different cell lines, tissues, or tissue states. Systematic investigation of the consistency between HPA and Swiss-Prot assignments of subcellular location, which is important for understanding and utilizing protein location data from the two databases, has not been described previously. In this paper, we quantitatively evaluate the consistency of subcellular location annotations between HPA and Swiss-Prot at multiple levels, as well as variation of protein locations across cell lines and tissues. Our results show that annotations of these two databases differ significantly in many cases, leading to proposed procedures for deriving and integrating the protein subcellular location data. We also find that proteins having highly variable locations are more likely to be biomarkers of diseases, providing support for incorporating analysis of subcellular location in protein biomarker identification and screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.