Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32935833›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Visual and Semantic Representations Predict Subsequent Memory in Perceptual and Conceptual Memory Tests.

Simon W Davis, Benjamin R Geib, Erik A Wing, Wei-Chun Wang, Mariam Hovhannisyan, Zachary A Monge, Roberto Cabeza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetically linked brain imaging markers of memory decline in aging and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Connectivity analyses for task-based fMRI.Physics of life reviews · 2024
    Review
  18. Visual Recognition Memory of Scenes Is Driven by Categorical, Not Sensory, Visual Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Representational formats of human memory traces.Brain structure & function · 2024
    Review
  20. Hippocampal Functions Modulate Transfer-Appropriate Cortical Representations Supporting Subsequent Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon W DavisCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Benjamin R GeibCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Erik A WingCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Wei-Chun WangCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Mariam HovhannisyanDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Zachary A MongeCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Roberto CabezaCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Funding

Life Satisfaction Around the WorldR01AG036784 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI SMITH, JAMES PATRICK · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Bilateral Brain Dynamics Supporting Cognition in Normal Aging and DementiaK01AG053539 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, SIMON W · 2017 to 2021
$518k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG053539NIA NIH HHS R01 AG036784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is generally assumed that the encoding of a single event generates multiple memory representations, which contribute differently to subsequent episodic memory. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and representational similarity analysis to examine how visual and semantic representations predicted subsequent memory for single item encoding (e.g., seeing an orange). Three levels of visual representations corresponding to early, middle, and late visual processing stages were based on a deep neural network. Three levels of semantic representations were based on normative observed ("is round"), taxonomic ("is a fruit"), and encyclopedic features ("is sweet"). We identified brain regions where each representation type predicted later perceptual memory, conceptual memory, or both (general memory). Participants encoded objects during fMRI, and then completed both a word-based conceptual and picture-based perceptual memory test. Visual representations predicted subsequent perceptual memory in visual cortices, but also facilitated conceptual and general memory in more anterior regions. Semantic representations, in turn, predicted perceptual memory in visual cortex, conceptual memory in the perirhinal and inferior prefrontal cortex, and general memory in the angular gyrus. These results suggest that the contribution of visual and semantic representations to subsequent memory effects depends on a complex interaction between representation, test type, and storage location.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain MappingConcept FormationFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryMemory, EpisodicNeuropsychological TestsPrefrontal CortexSemanticsVisual CortexVisual PerceptionDNNsepisodic memoryobject representationrepresentational similarity analysissemantic memory

Identifiers

PMID32935833
PMCPMC8485078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.