Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32935582›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2022

Physical Examination Is Predictive of Cauda Equina Syndrome: MRI to Rule Out Diagnosis Is Unnecessary.

Natalie L Zusman, Stephanie S Radoslovich, Spencer J Smith, Mary Tanski, Kenneth R Gundle, Jung Uck Yoo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Physiotherapist's Management of Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome in the United Kingdom: A National Survey.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie L Zusman6684Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-9999
Stephanie S Radoslovich6684Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9266-4060
Spencer J Smith6684Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Mary Tanski6684Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Kenneth R Gundle6684Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-0561
Jung Uck Yoo6684Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCross-sectional cohort study.

objectivesCauda equina syndrome (CES) is a neurologic emergency, and delay in diagnosis can result in irreversible impairment. Our purpose was to determine the value of physical examination in diagnosis of CES in patients complaining of bladder and/or bowel complications in the emergency department.

methodsAdult patients at one tertiary academic medical center that endorsed bowel/bladder dysfunction, underwent a lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and received an orthopedic spine surgery consultation from 2008 to 2017 were included. Patients consulted for trauma or tumor were excluded. A chart and imaging review was performed to collect demographic, physical examination, and treatment data. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated, and fast-and-frugal decision trees (FFTs) were generated using R.

resultsOf 142 eligible patients, 10 were diagnosed with CES. The sensitivity and specificity of the exam findings were highest for bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) (100% and 100%), followed by rectal tone (80% and 86%), postvoid residual bladder (80% and 59%), and perianal sensation (60% and 68%). The positive predictive value was high for BCR (100%), but low for other findings (13% to 31%). However, negative predictive values were consistently high for all examinations (96% to 100%). Two FFTs utilizing combinations of voluntary rectal tone, perianal sensation, and BCR resulted in no false negatives.

conclusionsA combination of physical examination findings of lower sacral function is an effective means of ruling out CES and, with further study, may eliminate the need for MRI in many patients reporting back pain and bowel or bladder dysfunction.

Indexed as

cauda equina syndromefast-and-frugal decision treeMRIphysical examination

Identifiers

PMID32935582
PMCPMC8907650
OpenAlexW3087066089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.