Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32935327›Full record

ReviewBehavior research methods2021

The application of noninvasive, restraint-free eye-tracking methods for use with nonhuman primates.

Lydia M Hopper, Roberto A Gulli, Lauren H Howard, Fumihiro Kano, Christopher Krupenye, Amy M Ryan, Annika Paukner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior research methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bonobos and chimpanzees remember familiar conspecifics for decades.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. How to improve data quality in dog eye tracking.Behavior research methods · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Eye Tracking in Dogs: Achievements and Challenges.Comparative cognition & behavior reviews · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lydia M HopperLester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL, 60614, USA. lhopper@lpzoo.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5953-3264
Roberto A GulliZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Lauren H HowardDepartment of Psychology, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, PA, 17603, USA.
Fumihiro KanoKumamoto Sanctuary, Kyoto University, Otao 990, Misumi, Uki, Kumamoto, Japan.
Christopher KrupenyeDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Amy M RyanThe UC Davis MIND Institute, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Annika PauknerDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training for Autism Researchers(RMI)T32MH073124 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Stephen Charles Noctor, Christine Wu Nordahl · 2004 to 2026
$6.8M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 50 years there has been a strong interest in applying eye-tracking techniques to study a myriad of questions related to human and nonhuman primate psychological processes. Eye movements and fixations can provide qualitative and quantitative insights into cognitive processes of nonverbal populations such as nonhuman primates, clarifying the evolutionary, physiological, and representational underpinnings of human cognition. While early attempts at nonhuman primate eye tracking were relatively crude, later, more sophisticated and sensitive techniques required invasive protocols and the use of restraint. In the past decade, technology has advanced to a point where noninvasive eye-tracking techniques, developed for use with human participants, can be applied for use with nonhuman primates in a restraint-free manner. Here we review the corpus of recent studies (N=32) that take such an approach. Despite the growing interest in eye-tracking research, there is still little consensus on "best practices," both in terms of deploying test protocols or reporting methods and results. Therefore, we look to advances made in the field of developmental psychology, as well as our own collective experiences using eye trackers with nonhuman primates, to highlight key elements that researchers should consider when designing noninvasive restraint-free eye-tracking research protocols for use with nonhuman primates. Beyond promoting best practices for research protocols, we also outline an ideal approach for reporting such research and highlight future directions for the field.

Indexed as

CognitionEye-Tracking TechnologyAnimalsEye MovementsHumansPrimatesComparative cognitionEye trackingNonhuman primateNoninvasive methodsPerceptionRefinementWelfare

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.