ArticleTropical animal health and production2020
Administration of a single dose of a PGF2α analogue (dinoprost) before sexual tests did not improve ram's sexual behaviour.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Systematic review of hormonal strategies to improve fertility in rams.Animal reproduction · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine if a single administration of dinoprost tromethamine before each test enhances sexual behaviour in inexperienced rams, and if the possible effect is maintained after the rams gain sexual experience. The study was conducted in northeaster Mexico during autumn (breeding season). The study was performed with 26 Saint Croix rams (16.1 ± 1.1 months old). Rams were allocated to two treatments, which were subjected to 15 tests with 2 restrained non-oestrous ewes. While rams from one group (group DIN) received a single dose of dinoprost (10 mg im, Lutalyse, Zoetis) immediately before the test, the other rams remained untreated (group CON). Sexual behaviours were recorded during 5 min. The data were analysed with a mixed model that included the treatment, number of test and their interaction as main effects, and the individual as a random effect. DIN rams displayed less ano-genital sniffings (6.6 ± 0.8 vs 9.7 ± 0.8, P = 0.007), matings (0.11 ± 0.05 vs 0.29 ± 0.05, P = 0.03), and had a lower mating/total mounts ratio (0.05 ± 0.03 vs 0.16 ± 0.03, P = 0.006) than CON rams. There were no other treatment effects, but there were significant effects of time and interactions between treatment and time in all the behaviours. Overall, administration of a single dose of dinoprost before testing did not have positive effects in the development of rams' sexual behaviour, and even, might have negative effects. However, it should be considered that in this study only one prostaglandin analogue, one dose of this analogue, administered immediately before the tests was used, so more studies involving other analogues, doses, and/or regimes of administration should be done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.