Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32935278›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2020

The London Classification: Improving Characterization and Classification of Anorectal Function with Anorectal Manometry.

S Mark Scott, Emma V Carrington

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05351034 (The Role of High-resolution Anorectal Manometry in the Diagnosis of Functional Anorectal Disorders in Patients With Inactive Inflammatory Bowel Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05351034 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Role of High-resolution Anorectal Manometry in the Diagnosis of Functional Anorectal Disorders in Patients With Inactive Inflammatory Bowel Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesArmsAnorectal manometry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interrater reliability in pediatric high-resolution anorectal manometry recordings.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Consensus Guidelines on Constipation in Adults in Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Physiology of lower gastrointestinal tract.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S Mark ScottNeurogastroenterology Group and GI Physiology Unit, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK. m.scott@qmul.ac.uk.
Emma V CarringtonNeurogastroenterology Group and GI Physiology Unit, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBSt. Vincent's University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewObjective measurement of anorectal sensorimotor function is a requisite component in the clinical evaluation of patients with intractable symptoms of anorectal dysfunction. Regrettably, the utility of the most established and widely employed investigations for such measurement (anorectal manometry (ARM), rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test) has been limited by wide variations in clinical practice. RECENT

findingsThis article summarizes the recently published International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) consensus and London Classification of anorectal disorders, together with relevant allied literature, to provide guidance on the indications for, equipment, protocol, measurement definitions and results interpretation for ARM, rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test. The London Classification is a standardized method and nomenclature for description of alterations in anorectal motor and sensory function using office-based investigations, adoption of which should bring much needed harmonization of practice.

Indexed as

ManometryAnal CanalAnus DiseasesHumansRectal DiseasesTerminology as TopicAnorectal manometryConstipationEvacuation disorderFaecal incontinenceIAPWG protocolLondon Classification

Identifiers

PMID32935278
PMCPMC7497505
OpenAlexW3085198314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.