Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32935181›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Pattern of treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia and pain: evidence on pharmacoutilization from a large real-world sample and from a centre for cognitive disturbances and dementia.

Damiana Scuteri, Marilù Vulnera, Brunella Piro, Roberto Bruno Bossio, Luigi Antonio Morrone, Giorgio Sandrini, Stefano Tamburin, Paolo Tonin, Giacinto Bagetta, Maria Tiziana Corasaniti

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Damiana ScuteriPharmacotechnology Documentation and Transfer Unit, Section of Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5846-7058
Marilù VulneraPharmacovigilance Territorial Service, Pharmaceutical Department, Provincial Health Authority, Cosenza, Italy.
Brunella PiroPharmacovigilance Territorial Service, Pharmaceutical Department, Provincial Health Authority, Cosenza, Italy.
Roberto Bruno BossioCenter for Diagnosis and Cure of Dementia, Neurology Service of the Health District of Cosenza, Provincial Health Authority, Cosenza, Italy.
Luigi Antonio MorronePharmacotechnology Documentation and Transfer Unit, Section of Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-8490
Giorgio SandriniDepartment of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation Neurologic Institute, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-6777
Stefano TamburinDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-2187
Paolo ToninRegional Center for Serious Brain Injuries, S. Anna Institute, Crotone, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-1378
Giacinto BagettaPharmacotechnology Documentation and Transfer Unit, Section of Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy. g.bagetta@unical.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8540-6218
Maria Tiziana CorasanitiDepartment of Health Science, University Magna Graecia, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6472-0697
University of Calabria · ITIstituto S.Anna Crotone · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeData concerning the number of diagnoses and of the drugs prescribed to patients affected by dementia are still scarce. Here we test whether or not (1) prescription of symptomatic drugs against Alzheimer's disease (AD) may approximate the number of patients affected by dementia in Italy and (2) adherence to this treatment affects the pattern of prescription of drugs (i.e. antipsychotics and antidepressants) for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and the previously reported limited prescription of analgesics.

methodsThis retrospective observational study concerns 84,235 subjects older than 60 years and registered in the provincial prescription database of the health district of Cosenza accounting for a population of 298,000 inhabitants. The prescribing pattern of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and analgesics has been investigated in patients receiving concurrent prescriptions of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI) and/or memantine. Data from a single centre for cognitive disturbances and dementia (CDCD) in the same health district were used to explore at which stage dementia was diagnosed. The study was approved by Calabria Region Ethical Committee no. 31/2017 and registered on October 31, 2017.

resultsThe data show that 859 patients are treated with AChEI and/or memantine; 420 patients (48.89%) receive at least 80% of the recommended medications. CDCD data indicate a delay in dementia diagnosis, which often was made when the patients were moderately to severely demented (Mini Mental State Examination, MMSE ≤ 20). Adherence did not influence prescription of most of the drugs explored, but use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was higher in non-adherent patients. Antipsychotics and antidepressants are frequently used (20.61-20.71% and 42.37-51.43%, respectively), and this, at least in part, might stem from the observed under-treatment of chronic pain (opioids are prescribed in the 4.76% and 12.46% of adherent and non-adherent patients and gabapentin and pregabalin are used in the 4.29% and 4.07% of adherent and non-adherent patients respectively), resulting in more frequent BPSD. 16.43% of patients receive antipsychotics for longer than 6-12 weeks.

conclusionThis 2-year period study, including a wide cohort of community demented patients, shows that dementia is diagnosed late and that prevalence of BPSD prescriptions is high and not impacted by adherence to anti-dementia drugs. The rate of prescription of potentially harmful antipsychotics and antidepressants appears to be high though whether the concomitantly observed limited prescription of analgesics might be a contributing factor needs to be further investigated. Our data support the development of strategies to improve the management of BPSD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnalgesicsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsDrug MonitoringDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPainPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrevalenceRetrospective StudiesAnalgesicsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsAlzheimer’s diseaseAnalgesicsAntidepressantsAntipsychoticsBPSDPain

Identifiers

PMID32935181
PMCPMC7803691
OpenAlexW3085108936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.