Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32935169›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2021

C-reactive protein and fracture risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies through the use of both frequentist and Bayesian approaches.

H Mun, B Liu, T H A Pham, Q Wu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pro-Osteogenic Effect of the Nutraceutical BlastiMin ComplexInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effect of hypersensitive C-reactive protein to albumin ratio on the risk of fragility fracture in the Chinese male population.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Clarification of some issues using Bayesian methods and model selection in meta-analysis and reporting.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  16. Letter to the Editor about the article "C-reactive protein and fracture risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies through the use of both frequentist and Bayesian approaches".Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

H MunDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health; Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine, College of Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA.
B LiuDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine, College of Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
T H A PhamSchool of Life Sciences, Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine, College of Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Q WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health; Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine, College of Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA. qing.wu@unlv.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4679-8903
University of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on all eligible cohort studies to evaluate the association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and osteoporotic fracture risk. Both frequentist and Bayesian approaches were employed for the meta-analysis. We found that high tertiles of hs-CRP were significantly associated with increased fracture risk.

introductionThe association between the inflammatory marker CRP and osteoporotic fracture has remained uncertain. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association of serum hs-CRP and fracture risk.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search of relevant databases, including PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE publications from January 1950 through April 2020. Three reviewers independently performed the study selection, quality assessment, and data abstraction. Frequentist and Bayesian hierarchical random-effects models were used separately for the analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Higgin's I

resultsFourteen cohort studies that reported t fracture outcomes were eligible for the systematic review. Only ten studies (n = 29,741) qualified for meta-analysis. In the frequentist approach, the RR for fracture in a comparison of the top tertile group to the bottom tertile group of hs-CRP was 1.54 (1.18, 2.01). The estimated risk of fracture remained significant in all sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Higgin's I

conclusionA high level of hs-CRP is associated with a significantly increased risk of osteoporotic fracture.

Indexed as

C-Reactive ProteinOsteoporotic FracturesBayes TheoremBiomarkersCohort StudiesHumansBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinBayesian meta-analysisC-reactive proteinFractureMeta-analysisOsteoporosisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32935169
OpenAlexW3087686878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.