Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32935160›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2021

Nusinersen treatment significantly improves hand grip strength, hand motor function and MRC sum scores in adult patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 3 and 4.

Bram De Wel, Veerle Goosens, Atka Sobota, Elke Van Camp, Ellen Geukens, Griet Van Kerschaver, Marlène Jagut, Kathleen Claes, Kristl G Claeys

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nusinersen in Adults with 5q Spinal Muscular Atrophy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Nusinersen for adults with spinal muscular atrophy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bram De WelDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Veerle GoosensDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Atka SobotaDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (Physiotherapy), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Elke Van CampDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (Physiotherapy), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ellen GeukensDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (Occupational Therapy), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Griet Van KerschaverDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (Occupational Therapy), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marlène JagutBelgian Neuromuscular Diseases Registry, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Kathleen ClaesDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kristl G ClaeysDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. Kristl.Claeys@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9937-443X
KU Leuven · BESciensano (Belgium) · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNusinersen recently became available as the first treatment for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) and data on its effectiveness and safety in adult SMA patients are still scarce.

methodsWe evaluated the effectiveness and safety of nusinersen treatment during 14 months in 16 adult patients with SMA types 3 and 4 in a prospective study, and retrospectively detailed the natural history of 48 adult SMA patients types 2, 3 and 4.

resultsHand grip strength (p = 0.03), hand motor function (p = 0.04) as assessed by a sub-score of the Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score (p = 0.04) improved significantly at month 14. Importantly, the MRC sum score had declined significantly (p < 0.01) prior to start of treatment in these patients. A minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) and RULM scores was achieved in 31% and 50% of the patients, respectively, but the mean changes from baseline failed to reach significance. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) transiently increased at month 6 (p = 0.01), whereas the Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) did not. The Activity Limitations scale declined significantly prior to start of treatment (p < 0.01) and showed an improvement with nusinersen which was not significant. The safety evaluation did not reveal serious adverse events and no signs of nephrotoxicity or antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated inflammation.

conclusionsWe conclude that hand grip strength and hand motor function, as well as MRC sum scores improved significantly in nusinersen-treated adult patients with SMA types 3 and 4.

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalSpinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodAdultHand StrengthHumansOligonucleotidesProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesnusinersenOligonucleotidesActivLimMuscle strengthNatural historyOutcome measuresSMASpinraza®

Identifiers

PMID32935160
OpenAlexW3086603080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.