ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2021
[Smartphone-based photographic wound documentation improves the quality of medical accounting in orthopedic and plastic surgery].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Medical Photography in a Level 1 Trauma Center by Implementing a Specialized Smartphone-Based App in Comparison to the Usage of Digital Cameras: Prospective Panel Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Usability of a mHealth Solution using Speech Recognition for Point-of-care Diagnostic Management.Journal of medical systems · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhotographic documentation of wounds, decubitus ulcers, tumors, open fractures and infections is an important part of digital patient files. It is unclear whether the photographic documentation has an effect on medical accounting with health insurance companies.
objectiveIt was hypothesized that Smartphone-based systematic photographic documentation can improve the confirmation of proceeds-relevant diagnoses and procedures as well as the duration. MATERIAL AND
methodsStaff in the emergency room, operating theater, outpatient clinic and on the wards were equipped with digital devices (Smartphone, tablet) including a photo-app. Medical accounting with the health insurance companies and identification of all case conferences in which the photographic documentation had effected a change in proceeds were analyzed for 2019 in a retrospective manner.
resultsOverall, 372 cases were discussed of which 27 cases were affected by the digital photographic documentation. Photographic documentation was used for clarification of the operative procedure (n = 5), primary diagnosis (n = 10), secondary diagnosis (n = 3), and length of hospitalization (n = 9). An average of 2119 € was negotiated and added per case affected by photographic documentation. Hereby, a level 1 trauma center gained an estimated 65,328 € in revenue. DISCUSSION: The use of Smartphone based photographic documentation can improve the overall quality of patient files and thus avoid loss of revenue. The implementation of digital devices with corresponding software is an important component of the digital structural change in hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.