Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32935111›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2020

Spatial and temporal trends in social vulnerability and COVID-19 incidence and death rates in the United States.

Brian Neelon, Fedelis Mutiso, Noel T Mueller, John L Pearce, Sara E Benjamin-Neelon

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian NeelonDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina (Brian Neelon, Fedelis Mutiso); Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Division of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (John L Pearce); Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Sara E Benjamin-Neelon).
Fedelis MutisoDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina (Brian Neelon, Fedelis Mutiso); Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Division of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (John L Pearce); Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Sara E Benjamin-Neelon).
Noel T MuellerDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina (Brian Neelon, Fedelis Mutiso); Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Division of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (John L Pearce); Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Sara E Benjamin-Neelon).
John L PearceDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina (Brian Neelon, Fedelis Mutiso); Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Division of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (John L Pearce); Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Sara E Benjamin-Neelon).
Sara E Benjamin-NeelonDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina (Brian Neelon, Fedelis Mutiso); Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (Noel T Mueller); Division of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (John L Pearce); Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Sara E Benjamin-Neelon).
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

The Effects of Diet on the Gut Microbiome and Short Chain Fatty AcidsK01HL141589 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MUELLER, NOEL T · 2018 to 2022
$845k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL141589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging evidence suggests that socially vulnerable communities are at higher risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks in the United States. However, no prior studies have examined temporal trends and differential effects of social vulnerability on COVID-19 incidence and death rates. The purpose of this study was to examine temporal trends among counties with high and low social vulnerability and to quantify disparities in these trends over time. We hypothesized that highly vulnerable counties would have higher incidence and death rates compared to less vulnerable counties and that this disparity would widen as the pandemic progressed.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis examining COVID-19 incidence and death rates from March 1 to August 31, 2020 for each county in the US. We obtained daily COVID-19 incident case and death data from USAFacts and the Johns Hopkins Center for Systems Science and Engineering. We classified counties using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a percentile-based measure from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in which higher scores represent more vulnerability. Using a Bayesian hierarchical negative binomial model, we estimated daily risk ratios (RRs) comparing counties in the first (lower) and fourth (upper) SVI quartiles. We adjusted for percentage of the county designated as rural, percentage in poor or fair health, percentage of adult smokers, county average daily fine particulate matter (PM2.5), percentage of primary care physicians per 100,000 residents, and the proportion tested for COVID-19 in the state.

resultsIn unadjusted analyses, we found that for most of March 2020, counties in the upper SVI quartile had significantly fewer cases per 100,000 than lower SVI quartile counties. However, on March 30, we observed a crossover effect in which the RR became significantly greater than 1.00 (RR = 1.10, 95% PI: 1.03, 1.18), indicating that the most vulnerable counties had, on average, higher COVID-19 incidence rates compared to least vulnerable counties. Upper SVI quartile counties had higher death rates on average starting on March 30 (RR = 1.17, 95% PI: 1.01,1.36). The death rate RR achieved a maximum value on July 29 (RR = 3.22, 95% PI: 2.91, 3.58), indicating that most vulnerable counties had, on average, 3.22 times more deaths per million than the least vulnerable counties. However, by late August, the lower quartile started to catch up to the upper quartile. In adjusted models, the RRs were attenuated for both incidence cases and deaths, indicating that the adjustment variables partially explained the associations. We also found positive associations between COVID-19 cases and deaths and percentage of the county designated as rural, percentage of resident in fair or poor health, and average daily PM2.5.

conclusionsResults indicate that the impact of COVID-19 is not static but can migrate from less vulnerable counties to more vulnerable counties over time. This highlights the importance of protecting vulnerable populations as the pandemic unfolds.

Identifiers

PMID32935111
PMCPMC7491526
OpenAlexW3086625271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.